On Jan 21, 8:48 am, Francois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 21, 12:36 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > LICENSE="GPL-2"
>
> > should be "GPL-2 or later" or whatever the Gentoo equivalent of that
> > is.
>
> I checked other ebuilds and it seems that the policy is to report only
>
On Jan 21, 12:36 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
dortmund.de> wrote:
>>
> LICENSE="GPL-2"
>
> should be "GPL-2 or later" or whatever the Gentoo equivalent of that
> is.
>
I checked other ebuilds and it seems that the policy is to report only
GPL-2 unless
there are exceptions attached. I am not s
On Jan 20, 2008, at 23:22 , William Stein wrote:
>
> On Jan 20, 2008 11:18 PM, Justin C. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Jan 20, 2008, at 23:00 , William Stein wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Jan 20, 2008 10:58 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jan 20, 2008 10:50 PM, Tim
Congratulations! Was my last message to you of any use?
Cheers,
Francois
On Jan 20, 5:46 am, gri6507 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As I've posted here before, I have been working on packaging up SAGE
> into an RPM form. Well, I am happy to say that I finally have
> something that (seems to) works
On Jan 19, 2008 8:46 AM, gri6507 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> As I've posted here before, I have been working on packaging up SAGE
> into an RPM form. Well, I am happy to say that I finally have
> something that (seems to) works. If anyone here has the ability and
> the spare time to test out th
On Jan 20, 2008 11:18 PM, Justin C. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Jan 20, 2008, at 23:00 , William Stein wrote:
>
> >
> > On Jan 20, 2008 10:58 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Jan 20, 2008 10:50 PM, Timothy Clemans
> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> The
On Jan 20, 2008 6:05 AM, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> William Stein wrote:
> > On Jan 19, 2008 3:51 PM, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Michael.Abshoff wrote:
> [...]
> >>> I would suggest that we add a mechanism for optional/experimental spkgs
> >>> to install other compon
On Jan 20, 2008, at 23:00 , William Stein wrote:
>
> On Jan 20, 2008 10:58 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Jan 20, 2008 10:50 PM, Timothy Clemans
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> The message that started this is
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree
On Jan 21, 8:00 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 20, 2008 10:58 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Jan 20, 2008 10:50 PM, Timothy Clemans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > The message that started this is
> > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Poss
On Jan 20, 2008 2:58 PM, Nick Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On 20-Jan-08, at 2:47 PM, Simon King wrote:
>
> >
> > Dear Nick
> >
> > On Jan 20, 8:24 pm, Nick Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I've always hated that x/y and print x/y can do different things at
> >> the prompt, b
On Jan 20, 2008 10:54 PM, Jonathan Bober <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I don't like the behavior illustrated below. Briefly, my problem is that
> GF(p).gen() gives a generator for the additive group of GF(5), while
> GF(p^n).gen() gives a generator for for multiplicative group of GF(p^n)
> (n > 1
On Jan 20, 2008 10:56 PM, Timothy Clemans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> That worked. Did you do anything?
No. The problem is that -- as has been discussed a lot already --
java applets are
unfortunately rather flaky. In particular, each time you display a
3d plot in Sage
it loads a jmol java
On Jan 20, 2008 10:58 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 20, 2008 10:50 PM, Timothy Clemans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > The message that started this is
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_images/2008_January_21#Image:Sagecontourplot.png
> >
> > If
On Jan 20, 2008 10:50 PM, Timothy Clemans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The message that started this is
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_images/2008_January_21#Image:Sagecontourplot.png
>
> If this person's is right that you can't release a screenshot of the
> Sage Notebo
That worked. Did you do anything?
On Jan 20, 10:54 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 20, 2008 10:44 PM, Timothy Clemans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I'm just getting the black box with the JMOL logo.
>
> Try restarting your web browser and using Firefox.
>
> > On Jan
I don't like the behavior illustrated below. Briefly, my problem is that
GF(p).gen() gives a generator for the additive group of GF(5), while
GF(p^n).gen() gives a generator for for multiplicative group of GF(p^n)
(n > 1).
I would file this 'complaint' directly as a trac bug report, but the
docum
On Jan 20, 2008 10:44 PM, Timothy Clemans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm just getting the black box with the JMOL logo.
>
Try restarting your web browser and using Firefox.
> On Jan 20, 10:35 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Jan 20, 2008 10:09 PM, Timothy Clemans <[EMAIL
The message that started this is
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_images/2008_January_21#Image:Sagecontourplot.png
If this person's is right that you can't release a screenshot of the
Sage Notebook under a CC license then I'm worried that the Sage
documentation can't actuall
I'm just getting the black box with the JMOL logo.
On Jan 20, 10:35 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 20, 2008 10:09 PM, Timothy Clemans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Interactive 3d plotting isn't working on the public notebook but does
> > work on my personal noteboo
On Jan 20, 2008 10:09 PM, Timothy Clemans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Interactive 3d plotting isn't working on the public notebook but does
> work on my personal notebooks on sage.math.
It works fine for me. What error message are you getting?
-- William
--~--~-~--~~---
Interactive 3d plotting isn't working on the public notebook but does
work on my personal notebooks on sage.math.
On Jan 20, 9:22 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This email is about the free public online Sage notebook server:
>https://www.sagenb.org
>
> I think I jus
Hi,
This email is about the free public online Sage notebook server:
https://www.sagenb.org
I think I just fixed some scalability issues that were responsible for
the online free
Sage notebook server feel vastly slower than it should have. Let me know what
your experience is like with it n
On Jan 20, 2008 8:37 PM, mabshoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Restarting it as suggested by William did teh trick. Note that instead
> of LaTeX we no use jsmath fonts.
Thanks. I think links to these introductions in different languages should be
in the main page or in the frontpage of the wiki.
On Jan 21, 2:11 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
dortmund.de> wrote:
> On Jan 21, 2:05 am, "Alfredo Portes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Thank you David.
>
> > Is the wiki down?
>
> Looks like it ... investigating.
Restarting it as suggested by William did teh trick. Note that instead
of LaT
On Jan 21, 2:05 am, "Alfredo Portes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thank you David.
>
> Is the wiki down?
>
Looks like it ... investigating.
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe fro
Thank you David.
Is the wiki down?
On Jan 20, 2008 5:38 PM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It's at
> http://wiki.sagemath.org/A_short_introduction_to_SAGE
> I updated it a bit a few days ago but it could use more editing.
>
>
> On Jan 20, 2008 2:51 PM, Alfredo Portes <[EMAIL PROTECT
On Jan 21, 12:36 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
dortmund.de> wrote:
> On Jan 21, 12:15 am, Francois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> > this is to point people interested in testing things on Gentoo towards
> > the ebuild I just posted in
> > bug#201321http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cg
On Jan 21, 12:15 am, Francois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is to point people interested in testing things on Gentoo towards
> the ebuild I just posted in
> bug#201321http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201321
Looks nice, but:
LICENSE="GPL-2"
should be "GPL-2 or later" or wha
Hi,
this is to point people interested in testing things on Gentoo towards
the ebuild I just posted in bug#201321
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201321
It compiles and install. I still chicken on using any python related
packages
provided by portage over the sage ones.
It currently fails
On 20-Jan-08, at 2:47 PM, Simon King wrote:
>
> Dear Nick
>
> On Jan 20, 8:24 pm, Nick Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I've always hated that x/y and print x/y can do different things at
>> the prompt, but it sounds like I'm fighting a losing battle.
>
> Sorry for coming into your discus
Dear Nick
On Jan 20, 8:24 pm, Nick Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've always hated that x/y and print x/y can do different things at
> the prompt, but it sounds like I'm fighting a losing battle.
Sorry for coming into your discussion. I actually appreciate that x/y
and print x/y do diff
It's at
http://wiki.sagemath.org/A_short_introduction_to_SAGE
I updated it a bit a few days ago but it could use more editing.
On Jan 20, 2008 2:51 PM, Alfredo Portes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jan 20, 2008 2:25 PM, Alfredo Portes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Same can be said for http://
On Jan 20, 2008 1:18 PM, Martin Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I've always hated that x/y and print x/y can do different things at
> > the prompt, but it sounds like I'm fighting a losing battle.
> >
> > Can someone (malb?) briefly document what the Sage standard for str
> > and repr sh
>>
>> Jaap
>
> Thanks Jaap for testing *every* release :)
Yes, thanks Jaap! Your contribution is very important.
Nick
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROT
> I've always hated that x/y and print x/y can do different things at
> the prompt, but it sounds like I'm fighting a losing battle.
>
> Can someone (malb?) briefly document what the Sage standard for str
> and repr should be, so we can start updating the code?
>
> Thanks!
> Nick
Hi,
I can write
On Jan 20, 9:24 pm, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> mabshoff wrote:
> > On Jan 20, 7:29 pm, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Jaap,
>
> >> There are two main entrances to the Experimental Packages:
>
> >>http://wiki.sagemath.org/experimental_packages_available_for_SAGE
>
> >
On Jan 20, 8:50 pm, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nick Alexander wrote:
Hi,
> > On 20-Jan-08, at 9:18 AM, Jaap Spies wrote:
> >> Maybe it's a good thing to have a naming convention, say
I am not to big a fan of this since I keep all my open source patches
in another place and I do pre
mabshoff wrote:
> On Jan 20, 7:29 pm, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Jaap,
>
>> There are two main entrances to the Experimental Packages:
>>
>> http://wiki.sagemath.org/experimental_packages_available_for_SAGE
>>
>> and
>>
>> http://www.sagemath.org/packages/experimental/
>>
>> Th
On Jan 20, 7:07 pm, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> mabshoff wrote:
> > Hello folks,
Hi Jaap,
> [...]
>
> > The tarball [201MB] is available at
>
> >http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-2.10.1/s...
>
> File "tut.py", line 3574:
> : factor(f)
> Expected:
>
On Jan 20, 7:29 pm, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Jaap,
> There are two main entrances to the Experimental Packages:
>
> http://wiki.sagemath.org/experimental_packages_available_for_SAGE
>
> and
>
> http://www.sagemath.org/packages/experimental/
>
> They seem to be out of sync.
Yep.
On Jan 20, 2008 2:25 PM, Alfredo Portes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Same can be said for http://wiki.sagemath.org/SAGE-intro-Spanish
Can anyone tell me where is the English version of this document if
there is one.
Thank you,
Alfredo
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To po
Nick Alexander wrote:
>
> On 20-Jan-08, at 9:18 AM, Jaap Spies wrote:
>> Maybe it's a good thing to have a naming convention, say
>
> I think so. I always attach my name, because I find it helps me keep
> track of what I have been involved in and helps attribute patches.
>
You can always a
On 20-Jan-08, at 9:18 AM, Jaap Spies wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I see a lot of variation in naming:
>
> 1746.patch
> 1653.hg
> trac-1855.patch
> trac_1715.patch
> trac_1485_matrix-group_reverse_.patch
>
> Maybe it's a good thing to have a naming convention, say
I think so. I always attach my name, bec
Same can be said for http://wiki.sagemath.org/SAGE-intro-Spanish
I did not know William's name in spanish is Guillermo :-), or is
Guillermo somebody in the project?
It reminds me of this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dGXr4uOnBrw
Anyways, I will try to improve the page.
Regards,
Alfredo
On
On 20-Jan-08, at 9:27 AM, Martin Albrecht wrote:
>
> On Sunday 20 January 2008, didier deshommes wrote:
>> On Jan 20, 2008 11:20 AM, Martin Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> bremen.de>
> wrote:
>>> Hi there,
>>>
>>> I've submitted the patch
>>>
>>>http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/1816
On Jan 18, 2:07 pm, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> .. but
> if someone wants
> to re-edit or even remove it, it won't bother me.
I've rewritten a lot to break it down to the most important facts
first and then three sub-pages for more information about installation
and usage. I think
There are two main entrances to the Experimental Packages:
http://wiki.sagemath.org/experimental_packages_available_for_SAGE
and
http://www.sagemath.org/packages/experimental/
They seem to be out of sync.
If you are an active maintainer of one or more experimental packages,
please step forwar
mabshoff wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
[...]
>
> The tarball [201MB] is available at
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-2.10.1/sage-2.10.1.alpha0.tar
>
File "tut.py", line 3574:
: factor(f)
Expected:
9 * (-x^5 + y^2)^2 * (x^6 - 2*x^3*y^2 - x^2*y^3 + y^4)
Got:
On Sunday 20 January 2008, didier deshommes wrote:
> On Jan 20, 2008 11:20 AM, Martin Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > I've submitted the patch
> >
> >http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/1816
> >
> > to trac and Nick refereed it. The patch implements that if a m
Hi,
I see a lot of variation in naming:
1746.patch
1653.hg
trac-1855.patch
trac_1715.patch
trac_1485_matrix-group_reverse_.patch
Maybe it's a good thing to have a naming convention, say
trac-number[-extra].patch for a trac related patch
and
trac-number[-extra].hg for a trac related bundle
Wha
On Jan 20, 2008 11:20 AM, Martin Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> I've submitted the patch
>
>http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/1816
>
> to trac and Nick refereed it. The patch implements that if a multivariate
> polynomial ring is 'print'ed the output is quite ver
On Saturday 19 January 2008, Jason Grout wrote:
> bill.p wrote:
> > Further info: I've retried it a large number of times and it only
> > happens occasionally.
> > It's not related to any particular cell or content as I have seen it
> > on several
> > different cells during this testing.
> > I man
On Jan 20, 2008 8:20 AM, Martin Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> I've submitted the patch
>
>http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/1816
>
> to trac and Nick refereed it. The patch implements that if a multivariate
> polynomial ring is 'print'ed the output is quite verb
Hi there,
I've submitted the patch
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/1816
to trac and Nick refereed it. The patch implements that if a multivariate
polynomial ring is 'print'ed the output is quite verbose and structured. This
behavior was in repr_long() before.
EXAMPLE:
{{{
sage:
William Stein wrote:
> On Jan 19, 2008 3:51 PM, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Michael.Abshoff wrote:
[...]
>>> I would suggest that we add a mechanism for optional/experimental spkgs
>>> to install other components like cmake.
>>>
>> cmake is only needed to build vtk, but generally spok
55 matches
Mail list logo
