On Jan 20, 2008 10:50 PM, Timothy Clemans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The message that started this is > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_images/2008_January_21#Image:Sagecontourplot.png > > If this person's is right that you can't release a screenshot of the > Sage Notebook under a CC license then I'm worried that the Sage > documentation can't actually be licensed under CC-by-sa since it > includes code from docstrings in the GPLed Sage code.
That's an excellent question. I personally think that all docstrings in Sage should be viewed as part of the Sage "documentation", and hence also be licensed under CC, since we state that all the documentation of Sage is so licensed (this could be a dual license -- it's under CC and GPL). Does anybody disagree? We're the copyright holders on 100% of this stuff, so it's up to us to decide. -- william --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
