>> Do old snapshots get deleted automatically?
>
> Not implemented yet, but definitely planned. Any suggestions for
> the default old-delete policy?
Logarithmic-ish. Keep 1 a minute for 10 minutes, 1 every 10 minutes for 100
minutes...
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To
On 8/1/07, Dan Christensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The notebook seems to save a snapshot of my worksheet every 3 minutes,
> even if I'm not using the worksheet. I often leave a few worksheets
> open for long periods of time, and these files build up and slow down my
> home directory synchr
On Aug 1, 2007, at 1:26 PM, Jonathan Bober wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 12:29 -0700, Justin C. Walker wrote:
[snip]
> Since the time with the self-compiled code is so similar to the time
> with the sage-compiled code, I would guess that you are linking to the
> sage mpfr library, which wasn't c
Incidentally, I should have mentioned here that I submitted a patch for
version .4, and also updated it at
http://www.math.lsa.umich.edu/~bober/partitions_c.cc
It uses long doubles now when then precision is small enough (and then,
later, just doubles like before), and the speedup is significant
On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 14:24 -0700, Bill Hart wrote:
> I do highly recommend this quad double library by the way. And they've
> implemented all manor of transcendental functions too!! The quad-
> doubles would give you 206 bits, even on your machine.
>
> Bill.
> URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ a
On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 12:29 -0700, Justin C. Walker wrote:
>
> On Jul 31, 2007, at 10:54 PM, Jonathan Bober wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 22:16 -0700, Justin C. Walker wrote:
> >> On Jul 31, 2007, at 18:36 , William Stein wrote:
> [snip]
> > That is puzzling. Are you sure that you have the lat
The notebook seems to save a snapshot of my worksheet every 3 minutes,
even if I'm not using the worksheet. I often leave a few worksheets
open for long periods of time, and these files build up and slow down my
home directory synchronization. Could the notebook only save a snapshot
when the pag
On Aug 1, 2007, at 12:29 PM, Justin C. Walker wrote:
>
>
> On Jul 31, 2007, at 10:54 PM, Jonathan Bober wrote:
>> On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 22:16 -0700, Justin C. Walker wrote:
>>> On Jul 31, 2007, at 18:36 , William Stein wrote:
> [snip]
>> That is puzzling. Are you sure that you have the latest ve
On Jul 31, 2007, at 10:54 PM, Jonathan Bober wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 22:16 -0700, Justin C. Walker wrote:
>> On Jul 31, 2007, at 18:36 , William Stein wrote:
[snip]
> That is puzzling. Are you sure that you have the latest version of the
> code?
I downloaded the .3 source and ran it on my
Hi,
Regarding the discrepancy in timings between me
and Justin Walker using OS X *intel* Mathematica,
it turns out I was running Mathematica on my
laptop under OS X via Rosetta, so those times should
be ignored. The timings I've posted under Linux are
all fine. SO, currently SAGE and Mathematic
On 8/1/07, Martin Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Too late, I just did it, since I needed it for something else I'm
> > doing (related to power series over polynomial rings). Martin,
> > please have a look, since you might be able to improve the patch.
>
> I spot two things:
> * The metho
On 8/1/07, Justin C. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The last version I posted to the list was significantly slower than
> > what
> > I have now (especially since I think I accidently had significant
> > improvements commented out in the last code I posted to the list.)
>
> That was the the
Reporting (a little late) a successful build of 2.7 followed by a good
upgrade to 2.7.2.1 on Feisty Fawn Core2Duo 1GB.
I noticed my last name was misspelled in the credits...
It is D. Raymer instead of 'Ramier'.
-Dorian
On 7/20/07, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On 7/20/07, Pabl
> Too late, I just did it, since I needed it for something else I'm
> doing (related to power series over polynomial rings). Martin,
> please have a look, since you might be able to improve the patch.
I spot two things:
* The method does not preserve the term ordering (which might be tricky anyh
Hi everyone,
I have a symmetric square matrix of real numbers, and I wish to
compute the (necessarily) real eigenvalues of this matrix.
sage: version()
'SAGE Version 2.7.2, Release Date: 2007-07-28'
sage: M = random_matrix(RDF, 4, 4)
sage: M += M.transpose()
Now M is such a matrix. My first in
On Jul 31, 2007, at 22:54 , Jonathan Bober wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 22:16 -0700, Justin C. Walker wrote:
>> On Jul 31, 2007, at 18:36 , William Stein wrote:
[snip]
>> On a Core 2 Duo 2.33 Mhz, computing the number of partitions of 10^9:
>>Mathematica 5.2 (PartitionsP[10^9]:95.51
16 matches
Mail list logo
