On 8/1/07, Justin C. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The last version I posted to the list was significantly slower than
> > what
> > I have now (especially since I think I accidently had significant
> > improvements commented out in the last code I posted to the list.)
>
> That was the the "Jon Bober" timing above. I'll try the latest one
> later.
Two comments for this thread:
(1) The PARI in SAGE is the latest stable release, which means
number_of_partitions(n, algorithm='pari') is *wrong* even on
some fairly small values of n.
(2) If you do
sage: hg_sage.apply('http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/was/sage.hg')
you'll get an update to my latest code (not 100% doc tested!) which
has the latest version of jon's code, and for which
number_of_partitions(n)
uses Jon's code by default.
William
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
