On 7/25/07, Timothy Clemans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How do you in general find out how say Magma or Mathematica does something?
Short answer: it is often virtually impossible -- that's one of the main
reasons for the existence of SAGE. Read this page for the official
Mathematica stance on t
Hi,
Since we were recently discussing speed of computing
Bell numbers, maybe it would be interesting to discuss
computing the number of partitions of an integer as a sum
of other positive integers, i.e.,
sage: number_of_partitions(5)
7
sage: v = list(partitions(5)); v
[(1, 1, 1, 1, 1
You probably know this already but the 2003 survey
www.math.rwth-aachen.de/~Gerhard.Hiss/Preprints/AlgoRepTheo.pdf
discusses briefly what is/was out there. I don't think it mentions
recent packages such as laguna, crime, and hap, but I don't know
of a more recent survey.
On 7/25/07, Dan Christen
And on a 1.5 Ghz G4 (rev 1.2):
real166m36.901s
user104m24.042s
sys 30m26.661s
-Marshall
On Jul 25, 8:28 pm, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jul 25, 2007, at 17:38 , William Stein wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 7/25/07, Justin C. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> For the
I don't know if this is related to what the original poster wants, but
I've been wondering lately whether there is software for doing
computations in modular representation theory (where the characteristic
of the field divides the order of the group). For example, computations
in the ring kG for
On Jul 25, 2007, at 17:38 , William Stein wrote:
>
> On 7/25/07, Justin C. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> For the record: Built and installed on PowerPC/G5, MacBook Pro/Core
>> Duo, MacBook Pro/Core 2 Duo.
>>
>> 'sage -testall' ran to completion on
>> G5: 3319 seconds
>> Core 2 Duo: 1697 s
On 7/25/07, Justin C. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For the record: Built and installed on PowerPC/G5, MacBook Pro/Core
> Duo, MacBook Pro/Core 2 Duo.
>
> 'sage -testall' ran to completion on
> G5: 3319 seconds
> Core 2 Duo: 1697 seconds
> Core Duo: 1951 seconds
>
How long did each build ta
On Jul 24, 2007, at 18:31 , William Stein wrote:
> Hello SAGErs,
>
> I have finally released SAGE-2.7.1, which includes scipy, g95
> (fortran), and should build
> and install fairly reliably on many machines. I've also posted
> binaries for OS X,
> Linux, and vmware at http://sagemath.org/downl
> Wow, excellent! Could you point me to a guide that explains
> what I have to do to go from what you've produced to also
> having a .deb for i386? (I have a 32-bit Debian install.)
Probably here:
http://www.debian.org/doc/maint-guide/ch-build.en.html
Ondrej
--~--~-~--~~
On 7/25/07, Nick Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> "Timothy Clemans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > A LaTeX document can easily be converted to different formats unlike a
> > wiki entry.
>
> Funniest thing I've heard today. First time I've heard that process
> be considered "easy". Tool
On 7/25/07, Georges Khaznadar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> William Stein a écrit :
> > (By the way, I released SAGE-2.7.1 yesterday.)
>
> The debian package is at
> /home/georgesk/development/sage/sage_2.7.1-1_amd64.deb
Wow, excellent! Could you point me to a guide that explains
what I have to
"Timothy Clemans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A LaTeX document can easily be converted to different formats unlike a
> wiki entry.
Funniest thing I've heard today. First time I've heard that process
be considered "easy". Tools such as hevea and latex2html do a
reasonable job, but they're cer
"William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 7/24/07, Nick Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> "Alec Mihailovs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > May I suggest to add timing to the examples in the documentation - that
>> > would be very useful.
>> >
>> > For example, in recent discussio
A LaTeX document can easily be converted to different formats unlike a
wiki entry.
On 7/25/07, Chris Chiasson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jul 25, 1:29 pm, "Michael Abshoff"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > SAGE already uses a MoinMoin Wiki installation.
>
> So I should amend my comment by a
On Jul 25, 1:29 pm, "Michael Abshoff"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> SAGE already uses a MoinMoin Wiki installation.
So I should amend my comment by asking:
Why not place the documentation in a MoinMoinWiki?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email t
The SAGE wiki:
http://www.sagemath.org:9001/
There is a link from the main page. MoinMoin with SAGE supports LaTeX.
-Bobby
On 7/25/07, Chris Chiasson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is conversion to LaTeX a requirement or merely a nice-to-have?
>
> On Jul 25, 1:16 pm, "Timothy Clemans" <[EMAIL
Is conversion to LaTeX a requirement or merely a nice-to-have?
On Jul 25, 1:16 pm, "Timothy Clemans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> That is already available by creating Wiki-books. Wiki-books can not
> be easily converted to LaTeX documents.http://en.wikibooks.org
>
> On 7/25/07, Chris Chiasson <[
It should be qualified that the user base for the site is small
because Mathematica already has a fair amount (actually, it is a
massive amount, but it isn't nearly enough for my taste) of
documentation.
On Jul 25, 1:16 pm, "Alec Mihailovs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > MediaWiki
>
> > There is
o yea, if you do go this route, don't forget about:
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:OpenID
On Jul 25, 1:00 pm, Chris Chiasson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Someone has to be evil and mention this:
> MediaWiki
>
> If you are willing to sacrifice absolute editorial control, the wiki
> docume
Chris Chiasson wrote:
>
> Someone has to be evil and mention this:
> MediaWiki
>
SAGE already uses a MoinMoin Wiki installation.
> If you are willing to sacrifice absolute editorial control, the wiki
> documentation can develop organically at its own pace and in the
> manner that the writers cho
That is already available by creating Wiki-books. Wiki-books can not
be easily converted to LaTeX documents. http://en.wikibooks.org
On 7/25/07, Chris Chiasson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Someone has to be evil and mention this:
> MediaWiki
>
> If you are willing to sacrifice absolute editoria
> MediaWiki
>
> There is already a site that wove together Mathematica and MediaWiki.
> The same could probably be done for SAGE. Of course, that site hasn't
> done so well because the Mathematica user base is so small ...
Assuming that SAGE's user base is larger?
Alec
--~--~-~--~~
Someone has to be evil and mention this:
MediaWiki
If you are willing to sacrifice absolute editorial control, the wiki
documentation can develop organically at its own pace and in the
manner that the writers choose.
There is already a site that wove together Mathematica and MediaWiki.
The same
On 7/24/07, Nick Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Alec Mihailovs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > May I suggest to add timing to the examples in the documentation - that
> > would be very useful.
> >
> > For example, in recent discussion about Bell numbers on the math-fun list,
> > it was
"Alec Mihailovs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> May I suggest to add timing to the examples in the documentation - that
> would be very useful.
>
> For example, in recent discussion about Bell numbers on the math-fun list,
> it was noted that it takes a very long time to calculate bell(1000) in
25 matches
Mail list logo
