There isn't an option that the first (only the first) post or comment
has to be approved by a moderator?
There is for example in Wordpress and has saved me from a lot of spam
on my blog!
Regards
Tiziano
On Jun 20, 5:05 am, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Deleted, banned, reported.
>
Things like this are definitely needed. So what came out of the
redesign
of the coercion model at SD4?
Michel
On Jun 20, 6:14 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> A while ago, I wrote a little function that took a multivariate polynomial
> into a corresponding recursive univariate polynomial. Would
A while ago, I wrote a little function that took a multivariate polynomial into
a corresponding recursive univariate polynomial. Would people be interested in
this?
On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, Gonzalo Tornaria wrote:
> Here is a prototype for the tricky part of the coercion (recursive
> base extens
Here is a prototype for the tricky part of the coercion (recursive
base extension).
It seems to catch all the examples I came up with. Please test, and
add more examples if needed. I will be rewriting this in py
Note that this doesn't work for multivariate polynomials (the tests
use recursive univ
Hi All,
I am trying to write a small class which implements symmetric
matrices, but I'm unclear how to inherit from
sage.matrix.matrix_dense. How can I tell what the initialization
does, and how to properly call it? I tried looking at
sage.matrix.matrix_integer_dense.pyx to do this, but I'm sti
Deleted, banned, reported.
This person joined a week ago or so, therefore presumably does not
qualify as "recently joined" and hence moderated. The next level is
probably to require all people joining the list to get an invitation.
There are 2 options:
(1) must be invited by the owner,
(2) must b
"Britains Got Talent * Connie, 6, WOWs Simon Cowell !!!"
Watch it at http://www.videofortoday.com/?vID=1182081447
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Jun 19, 4:31 pm, Hamptonio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree, the singular output is nice.I don't use such big rings,
> but I very often use two blocks: variables and parameters.
>
> On Jun 19, 7:26 am, Martin Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > On Tuesday 19 June 2007 14:55, M
"didier deshommes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Jun 1, 10:59 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> package_dir
>> spkg-install-- (required) shell script run to install the package
>> spkg-rebuild -- (optional) download latest version of package from
>>
Michel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I can confirm that this particular test *sometimes* fails for me also.
Does it always fail the same way? With the same output, on both
machines?
Nick
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@goog
Done (for all three groups).
On 6/19/07, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 6/19/07, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > deleted, reported, and banned.
> >
> > Incidently, there is an option "Messages from new members are moderated"
> > which I can set. This means that ne
Hi folks,
My pics are available at
http://www.sagemath.org:9001/days4/Pictures
Regards,
Ifti
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options,
On 6/19/07, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> deleted, reported, and banned.
>
> Incidently, there is an option "Messages from new members are moderated"
> which I can set. This means that new members might have a delay to their
> posting. Any thoughts? It would eliminate spam I think.
deleted, reported, and banned.
Incidently, there is an option "Messages from new members are moderated"
which I can set. This means that new members might have a delay to their
posting. Any thoughts? It would eliminate spam I think.
On 6/19/07, jobs 6677 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
On 6/19/07, Joel B. Mohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think that it has way deeper problems than that. I like the new layout of
> the files in the tar ball, but the hg repository doesn't reflect this new
> layout. I'm not exactly sure what is supposed to be in the repository -- all
> of the
On 6/19/07, Michel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> William,
>
> A while ago I reported that the implementation of
>
> RR(0).exact_rational()
>
> made some machines run out of memory, giving weird
> doctest errors.
>
> You posted a patch (special casing zero) but I now see
> in the source of sage-2.
Hi,
Look whats in the news nowadays!!!...I saw this on a website and found
it useful for me , thought it would be helpful for you too.Also send this
information to all your friends and to people who would like to have a look
at it and take benefit from it.
Regards,
Priya.
--~--~-~--~
I can confirm that this seems to be what is going on. Usually, when I
run
./sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/rings/real_mpfr.pyx
all of my memory gets eaten up. It worked just fine once, but never
again. And I just tried
RR(0).exact_rational()
which causes the same problems.
On Tue, 2007-06-19
William,
A while ago I reported that the implementation of
RR(0).exact_rational()
made some machines run out of memory, giving weird
doctest errors.
You posted a patch (special casing zero) but I now see
in the source of sage-2.6 you forgot to apply it.
Can you please apply!
Regards,
Michel
Thanks, this does clarify what goes on in an update.
> The sage-update script gives an idea of how sage is upgraded from a
> SAGE_SERVER:
> - download the new install script
> - download the new list file. The list file contains all spkgs with
> their version numbers. It is from it that sage kno
> On 6/18/07, Brian Granger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I didn't know SAGE was actually using them. Is this when sage -update
> > is run? My understanding is that the decision to upgrade something
> > was based on the timestamps if the files compared with the stub in the
> > installed directo
I agree, the singular output is nice.I don't use such big rings,
but I very often use two blocks: variables and parameters.
On Jun 19, 7:26 am, Martin Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 June 2007 14:55, Martin Albrecht wrote:
>
> > Hi there,
>
> > I would like to gather some
On Tuesday 19 June 2007 14:55, Martin Albrecht wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I would like to gather some options on the way multivariate polynomial
> rings are printed in SAGE.
Sorry for replying to myself, I meant to gather opinions not options of
course. In case you wondered ...
Martin
--
name: M
Hi there,
I would like to gather some options on the way multivariate polynomial rings
are printed in SAGE. I happen to construct quite big rings with block
orderings, so the usual one-line representation gets messy quickly. So I
would like to have method -- like long_repr or so -- to print a
Sorry about that! Should be fixed in a few minutes.
On 6/19/07, Michael Abshoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> David Joyner wrote:
> >
> > Hi:
> > Some SD4 photos at posted at
> > http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wdj/sd4photos/images.html,
> > or at least they will be in 5 minutes or so.
> >
David Joyner wrote:
>
> Hi:
> Some SD4 photos at posted at
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wdj/sd4photos/images.html,
> or at least they will be in 5 minutes or so.
> - David
>
Sorry, but
You don't have permission to access /home/wdj/sd4photos/STA70416.JPG on
this server.
(and probably o
Hi:
Some SD4 photos at posted at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wdj/sd4photos/images.html,
or at least they will be in 5 minutes or so.
- David
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this gro
On 6/18/07, Brian Granger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Then SAGE wouldn't know that the package had been updated.
> > Those version numbers are used to determine whether it is
> > necessary to install a package.
>
> I didn't know SAGE was actually using them. Is this when sage -update
> is run?
28 matches
Mail list logo
