On Jun 19, 4:31 pm, Hamptonio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I agree, the singular output is nice. I don't use such big rings, > but I very often use two blocks: variables and parameters. > > On Jun 19, 7:26 am, Martin Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > On Tuesday 19 June 2007 14:55, Martin Albrecht wrote: > > > > Hi there, > > > > I would like to gather some options on the way multivariate polynomial > > > rings are printed in SAGE. > > > Sorry for replying to myself, I meant to gather opinions not options of > > course. In case you wondered ... > > > Martin > I agree, it looks pretty good and since I create rather large rings with CTC for example I would certainly prefer something like that. Slightly OT: Do you plan to release the Small Scale AES with you mutlivariate crypto system package any time soon? I have some code to create SymbolicData.org output for the CTC examples (which still needs to be cleaned up). I am currently at CoCoA School and next week is MEGA, so I won't be able to play with it for at least another 10 days - so no preassure from me :) Cheers, Michael --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
