At the risk of saying something really stupid (as I am relatively
clueless
in the matter)it seems LD_PRELOAD is often used
to achieve the effect you want.
Michel
On Jun 5, 7:18 am, Joshua Kantor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a C question, I was hoping someone had some advice on.
>
>
This is a C question, I was hoping someone had some advice on.
Many linear algebra libraries such as lapack, and blas have an error
handling routine called xerbla_ that is called if there is an
unrecoverable error. Unfortunately this often calls exit which cannot
be caught so sage exits.
If one
William already posted a patch to this in another thread!
On Jun 4, 7:39 pm, Nick Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > PS. Strictly speaking one should use os.path.separator instead of
> > "/" :-)
>
> Perhaps os.path.realpath and os.path.normpath are even better? I
> think Kate Minola will h
This is because matrix windows are not matrices--just views into an
attached matrix. There is a matrix_from_rows_and_columns command that
you might be able to use.
sage: M = matrix(QQ, 4, 4, range(16))
sage: M.matrix_from_rows_and_columns([1,2,0],[0,3])
[ 4 7]
[ 8 11]
[ 0 3]
I don't think
> PS. Strictly speaking one should use os.path.separator instead of
> "/" :-)
Perhaps os.path.realpath and os.path.normpath are even better? I
think Kate Minola will have to patch this, because such automounted
paths are rare.
Nick
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post
I noticed that my jail was missing a find command. I installed
it and tried again. This time the compilation worked.
I don't see any relation between a missing find command and
the error but who knows...
gzip, find, flex, bison are some packages that the prerequisite
scanner does not check but t
On Monday 04 June 2007 16:39, Michel wrote:
> I building SAGE in a FC7 chroot jail in FC4. Everything went fine
> until Singular
> Singular has problems with ndbm.dl_o. What is ndbm.dl_o???
Maybe a 'make clean' in the Singular and the kernel subdirs helps?
--
name: Martin Albrecht
_pgp: ht
I building SAGE in a FC7 chroot jail in FC4. Everything went fine
until Singular
Singular has problems with ndbm.dl_o. What is ndbm.dl_o???
Michel
==Error message
make[3]: Entering directory `/root/sage-2.6/spkg/build/
singular-3-0-2-20070
I building SAGE in a FC7 chroot jail in FC4. Everything went fine
until Singular
Singular has problems with ndbm.dl_o. What is ndbm.dl_o???
Michel
==Error message
make[3]: Entering directory `/root/sage-2.6/spkg/build/
singular-3-0-2-20070
I building SAGE in a FC7 chroot jail in FC4. Everything went fine
until Singular
Singular has problems with ndbm.dl_o. What is ndbm.dl_o???
Michel
==Error message
make[3]: Entering directory `/root/sage-2.6/spkg/build/
singular-3-0-2-20070
On 6/4/07, Joel B. Mohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying a "sage -upgrade" to go from v. 2.5.3 to 2.6. I'm getting a
> patching error on clisp. It wants a "File to patch". Full transcript in the
> P.S. Any ideas how I could resolve this?
>
> I did not try building from scratch using t
Hi,
I'm trying a "sage -upgrade" to go from v. 2.5.3 to 2.6. I'm getting a
patching error on clisp. It wants a "File to patch". Full transcript in the
P.S. Any ideas how I could resolve this?
I did not try building from scratch using the sage-2.6 tarball. I will try
that now.
--
Joel
On Jun 4, 2:46 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the bug report about strip_automount_prefix. Please try
> the attached sage-test.
>
> On 6/4/07, Michel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > I am working on my chroot jail but this time I am stuck. Doctests fail
> >
On 6/4/07, Michel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Does anybody recognize this situation? In particular I am very worried
> > that my
> > prompt is In [x]: and not sage:... What could possibly cause this?
> >
> This I could solve by deleting all .directories in the home
> directory.
> Remains the fa
>
> Does anybody recognize this situation? In particular I am very worried
> that my
> prompt is In [x]: and not sage:... What could possibly cause this?
>
This I could solve by deleting all .directories in the home
directory.
Remains the fact that interfaces don't start from within sage.
Michel
Thanks for the bug report about strip_automount_prefix. Please try
the attached sage-test.
On 6/4/07, Michel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am working on my chroot jail but this time I am stuck. Doctests fail
> because SAGE cannot start the standard interfaces. Here is a typical
> exception.
>
On 6/4/07, kaimmello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Relicensing code is difficult unless you have copyright assignment
> > (which SAGE doesn't) or you are a "young" project with contact to all
> > (significant) contributers.
> >
>
> If I remember well, somewhere William Stein asked the contributor
Hi,
I am working on my chroot jail but this time I am stuck. Doctests fail
because SAGE cannot start the standard interfaces. Here is a typical
exception.
In [6]: maxima.interact()
---
Traceback (most recent call
la
Hi,
I am working on a chroot jail for SAGE under Fedora. I am making good
progress
and already have a SAGE prompt (a FC7 install inside FC4!).
Now I want to run doctests but I am running into a little problem. I
have installed
SAGE in /sage-2.6.linux32bit-i686-Linux/
(in other words in an immedi
> Relicensing code is difficult unless you have copyright assignment
> (which SAGE doesn't) or you are a "young" project with contact to all
> (significant) contributers.
>
If I remember well, somewhere William Stein asked the contributors to
put him as a co-owner of the copyright, it was to sol
On Jun 4, 11:21 am, kaimmello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jun 4, 11:03 am, Michel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Personally I think the extra patent protection provided by the GPL3
> > would be a good thing for SAGE and for open source CAS's in general.
>
> I agree with you because algorit
On Jun 4, 11:03 am, Michel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Personally I think the extra patent protection provided by the GPL3
> would be a good thing for SAGE and for open source CAS's in general.
I agree with you because algorithms of CAS's can be patented in the
future and GPLv3 protects againt
Personally I think the extra patent protection provided by the GPL3
would be a good thing for SAGE and for open source CAS's in general.
But I assume this issue depends mainly on the software SAGE itself
depends on.
I might be mistaken but I think Maxima is GPL2 only.
Michel
PS. I think the GPL3
The last draft of GPLv3 has been released. Richard Stallman himself
has said that GPLv2 and GPLv3 are incompatible, i.e. you can't merge
code with this two licenses. I was wondering what SAGE will do about
this. Will it remain GPLv2? Or will it become GPLv3? Personally I hope
the second.
Regards
24 matches
Mail list logo
