There are many cases where you would *WANT* to coerce between
polynomial rings with different orderings, think:
*Q1[x,y] with grevlex for heavy duty computations
*Q2[x,y] wih elimination order for y to project on the x-line
*Q3[x,y] with elimination order for x to project on the y-line
(of cours
To finish answering (5),
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/sage$ ./sage
--
| SAGE Version 2.4.1.2, Release Date: 2007-03-28 |
| Type notebook() for the GUI, and license() for information.|
--
Sorry, amend (2)- I'm on sage.math
On Mar 30, 11:38 am, "Robert Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (1) I did ./sage -upgrade.
> (2) Yes
> (3) The last 4 lines of install.log are
> """
> Successfully installed gap_packages-4.4.9
> Now cleaning up tmp files.
> Making SAGE/Python scripts relocatab
(1) I did ./sage -upgrade.
(2) Yes
(3) The last 4 lines of install.log are
"""
Successfully installed gap_packages-4.4.9
Now cleaning up tmp files.
Making SAGE/Python scripts relocatable...
Making script relocatable
"""
(?)
(4) Nothing
(5) Waiting to see... (to be continued)
On Mar 30, 11:32 am,
On 3/30/07, joseph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How I can learn about designing database via C# well?
> Please help me.
You have posted to the wrong mailing list. Do not post to this list again.
--- William
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send emai
PS- I also tried renaming sage-main to sage-old and doing sage-upgrade
again,
but I'm not getting a new sage-main that way...
On Mar 30, 11:28 am, "Robert Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Upgrading from 2.3 to 2.4.1.2, and getting very strange behavior:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/sage$ ./sage
>
1) how did you upgrade? Did you do "sage -upgrade"?
2) Is this on a (=my) Macbook Pro?
3) Were there any errors in the install.log during the upgrade, or did
it complete fine?
4) If you do "./sage -upgrade" again what happens?
5) If you move devel/sage-main elsewhere and delete the devel/sage sym
How I can learn about designing database via C# well?
Please help me.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http:
Upgrading from 2.3 to 2.4.1.2, and getting very strange behavior:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/sage$ ./sage
--
| SAGE Version 2.4.1.2, Release Date: 2007-03-28 |
| Type notebook() for the GUI, and license() for informa
First, you're right that you don't need the "if self._initalized"
line. Secondly, I'm curious as to your motivation for calling the
Matrix_integer_dense directly, then calling the __init__ method later
on. I would probably just create a new integer_matrix_dense in the
__init__ method and (
So, I think I might want to use the __new__ function of Matrix_integer_dense
directly, but I don't really know what I'm doing (thus contradicting the
warning in the docstring for that function). So I thought I would check
with the list.
A p-adic matrix will include an integer matrix of values. S
On Friday 30 March 2007 01:24, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> If we coerce from, say, R = QQ['x', 'y'] to S = QQ['y', 'x'] than R(f)
> (a,b) = S(f)(b,a) which I think could be confusing, so it might take
> some convincing to make me think that coercing from R to S is a good
> idea. For the strict su
12 matches
Mail list logo
