[rtgwg] Re: Thoughts on draft-ietf-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa-18.txt

2024-12-01 Thread Ahmed Bashandy
Stewart, I looked back till version -00 of the draft and I was NOT able to find a version that says post-conversion is a MUST-have or MANDATORY. But I may have overlooked such version. Because you are the shepherd of this document and I am sure you have reviewed it tens (if not hundreds) of

[rtgwg] Re: Please review and comment draft-ietf-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa

2024-12-01 Thread Ahmed Bashandy
Yingzhen, As you mention, Section 11 title is "*_/Advantages/_* ..." and not "mandatory", "must", "required",..., etc. Section 11 was moved to an appendix based on comments, not based on a change in the stance of the draft about the repair path being congruent to post-convergence or not As f