Routing policies for AFI/SAFI with "typed" NLRI in RFC 9067

Hi, I have looked up RFC 9067 in order to understand whether it supports ability to define NRLI-type-specific conditions in policies that are applied to AFI/SAFI that use "typed" NLRI, and I did not find anything relevant. I wonder if the need for

Re: Routing policies for AFI/SAFI with "typed" NLRI in RFC 9067

Hi Sasha, But the RFC9067 supports route type match under policy definitions so I am not sure what the question is :) | +--rw match-route-type | +--rw route-type* identityref | +--rw bp:bgp-conditions | +--rw bp:me

RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: Routing policies for AFI/SAFI with "typed" NLRI in RFC 9067

Robert, Lots of thanks for a prompt response. The examples that I see in the RFC refer to protocol-specific route types (like IS-IS Level 1 or Level 2). I am not sure the RFC covers “typed NLRI”. Do I miss something? Regards, Sasha From: Robert Raszuk Sent: Thursday, June 6, 2024 6:23 PM To: A

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Routing policies for AFI/SAFI with "typed" NLRI in RFC 9067

Hey, This is when YANG model RFC fun begins :) So for BGP we have two different route-types (ibgp vs ebgp) and route-type within NLRIs. Any YANG expert can correct me if my reading of this is wrong but the way I understand this is that the former is of type "identityref" and the latter is of typ

RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: Routing policies for AFI/SAFI with "typed" NLRI in RFC 9067

Rob, Lots of thanks for a very important response! So, the RFC defines proto-route-type (with lots of details) and bp:route-type ( mentioned just once without any description, examples etc.)… Instead it says that the prefix bp: means a definition that is imported from the BGP Policy Model

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Routing policies for AFI/SAFI with "typed" NLRI in RFC 9067

> Is this a duplication? An error? Or something else? > One is IBGP the other EBGP. > And how can I express a condition that refers to EVPN, > MCAST-VPN or BGP-LS (RFC 7752 ) routes of a > specific NLRI Type in a BGP policy? For EVPN there is also e

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Routing policies for AFI/SAFI with "typed" NLRI in RFC 9067

Robert, Again, lots of thanks! The expired EVPN Yang model dos not help IMHO: unless I am mistaken, it only deals with EVPN route types in the RIB, but not in the policies. Regards, Sasha Get Outlook for Android From: Robert Raszuk Se

Fwd: Nomcom 2024-2025 Third Call For Volunteers

Hi, Please consider volunteering for the nomcom. Thanks, Yingzhen -- Forwarded message - From: NomCom Chair 2024 Date: Thu, Jun 6, 2024 at 10:57 AM Subject: Nomcom 2024-2025 Third Call For Volunteers To: IETF Announcement List Cc: The IETF tools development team identified

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Routing policies for AFI/SAFI with "typed" NLRI in RFC 9067

Hi Sasha, BGP specific options regarding policy is defined in the BGP policy module. I haven’t looked at the EVPN YANG model for a while, but if it’s a EVPN only option, like EVPN NLRI type, it should be defined in the EVPN YANG model, or it can be done through an augmentation. Thanks, Yingzhe