Robert,
Lots of thanks for a prompt response.

The examples that I see in the RFC refer to protocol-specific route types (like 
IS-IS Level 1 or Level 2).
I am not sure the RFC covers “typed NLRI”. Do I miss something?

Regards,
Sasha

From: Robert Raszuk <rob...@raszuk.net>
Sent: Thursday, June 6, 2024 6:23 PM
To: Alexander Vainshtein <alexander.vainsht...@rbbn.com>
Cc: yingzhen...@futurewei.com; jefftant.i...@gmail.com; a...@cisco.com; 
xufeng.liu.i...@gmail.com; rtgwg@ietf.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Routing policies for AFI/SAFI with "typed" NLRI in RFC 
9067

Hi Sasha,

But the RFC9067 supports route type match under policy definitions so I am not 
sure what the question is :)



                 |  +--rw match-route-type

                 |     +--rw route-type*     identityref

                 |  +--rw bp:bgp-conditions

                 |     +--rw bp:med-eq?       uint32

                 |     +--rw bp:origin-eq?    bt:bgp-origin-attr-type

                 |     +--rw bp:next-hop-in*  inet:ip-address-no-zone

                 |     +--rw bp:afi-safi-in*  identityref

                 |     +--rw bp:local-pref-eq?  uint32

                 |     +--rw bp:route-type?     enumeration

On Thu, Jun 6, 2024 at 4:51 PM Alexander Vainshtein 
<alexander.vainsht...@rbbn.com<mailto:alexander.vainsht...@rbbn.com>> wrote:
Hi,
I have looked up  RFC 9067<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9067> in 
order to understand whether it supports ability to define NRLI-type-specific 
conditions in policies that are applied to AFI/SAFI that use “typed” NLRI, and 
I did not find anything relevant.

I wonder if the need for such conditions have ever been considered. If not, can 
somebody please explain why?

One example that comes to my mind is a policy that would apply  specific 
actions to IP Prefix (EVPN Type 5, RFC 
9136<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9136>) routes with a specific 
destination while ignoring EVPN routes of other types.

For comparison, Section 5.4 of RFC 
7606<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7606#section-5.4> defines 
dedicated rules for handling the situations in which a BGP speaker supports 
only some, but not all NLRI in a given “typed” AFI/SAFI.

Your timely feedback would be highly appreciated.

Regards, and lots of thanks in advance,
Sasha



Disclaimer

This e-mail together with any attachments may contain information of Ribbon 
Communications Inc. and its Affiliates that is confidential and/or proprietary 
for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, disclosure, reliance or 
distribution by others or forwarding without express permission is strictly 
prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender 
immediately and then delete all copies, including any attachments.
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list -- rtgwg@ietf.org<mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
To unsubscribe send an email to 
rtgwg-le...@ietf.org<mailto:rtgwg-le...@ietf.org>
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list -- rtgwg@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rtgwg-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to