If this general topic is going to be put on the agenda, may I ask
that the proposal for a hybrid registration policy [3], which
addresses a very similar, and closely related issue, be placed on the
agenda and included in the discussion.
thanks,
john klensin
[3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/
It may be of interest that in some cases blocks of parameter values in
RFC 9542 and its predecessors back though RFC 5342 are assigned under
a policy called, in these RFCs, "IESG Ratification". This provides for
Expert Review and then, if the Expert approves or is uncertain, the
final decision is m
--On Sunday, May 26, 2024 17:39 -0400 Donald Eastlake
wrote:
> It may be of interest that in some cases blocks of parameter values
> in RFC 9542 and its predecessors back though RFC 5342 are assigned
> under a policy called, in these RFCs, "IESG Ratification". This
> provides for Expert Review
Hi John,
> […] Another part of the problem, sort
> of mentioned and partially addressed in my draft, is that there
> appear to be a growing number of topics in which there is tension
> between the value of trying to be sure everything relevant gets
> registers and getting high-quality review and
