If this general topic is going to be put on the agenda, may I ask that the proposal for a hybrid registration policy [3], which addresses a very similar, and closely related issue, be placed on the agenda and included in the discussion.
thanks, john klensin [3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-klensin-iana-consid-hybrid/ --On Saturday, May 25, 2024 23:14 +0200 Carsten Bormann <c...@tzi.org> wrote: > On 10. May 2024, at 22:13, Rifaat Shekh-Yusef > <rifaat.s.i...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> If you would like time at the meeting to discuss your work or >> ideas, please reply to this email with your request by May 24th. > > I apologize for being a day late (but of course time does not > actually advance during weekends…). > > We have had a longstanding, small but tricky problem with the IANA > registration policies defined in BCP 26: this has policies that > involve designated experts and policies that require some IETF > consensus (IETF review, Standards Action), but no policies that > actually combine these requirements. > > One might think that IETF consensus should be higher-ranking than > expert review, but for some registries there is registry-specific > knowledge that may be required for making a correct registration > and that may be concentrated in the designated experts. IETF > consensus based registration sometimes circumvents that knowledge, > which can lead to incorrect registrations or to emergency actions > to avoid such incorrect registrations (which in turn can lead to > port-465-style problems [2]). > > The draft at [0] aims to create pre-made policies that solve this > problem by combining IETF consensus with expert review. > > This has been discussed for almost a decade, probably more during > meetings than on mailing lists. Finally writing this up was > triggered by the specific instance of [1]. > > We would like to discuss this issue (and how well the current draft > succeeds at addressing the issue) on the gendispatch ML, adjust the > draft, and then have it on the agenda of the gendispatch meeting in > Vancouver. > > Grüße, Carsten > > > [0]: > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-bormann-gendispatch-with-expe > rt-review-00.html > > [1]: > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/BENVbgmF0px40GPW-zlA4nHI > 8So > > [2]: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8314 > (The 465 problem was created by a set of circumstances distinct > from the problem we hope to solve by "…with expert review", > but it is a rather impressive example for how long unstable > registrations can linger if not addressed heads-on early. > > _______________________________________________ > dispatch mailing list -- dispa...@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to dispatch-le...@ietf.org _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list -- rtgwg@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to rtgwg-le...@ietf.org
