Hi Adrian,
Sorry for the late reply. Please see my answers below inline.
Thanks,
Yingzhen
On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 3:38 AM Adrian Farrel wrote:
> Hey, Yingzhen.
>
> [snip]
>
> I am happy with the concept of providing an initial discussion venue for
> such topics, but:
>
>- What does “incubat
Hey, Yingzhen.
[snip]
I am happy with the concept of providing an initial discussion venue for such
topics, but:
* What does “incubation” mean in practice? I think this needs to be
spelled out in the charter text because, as it stands, it is unclear where you
would draw the line. Why wo
Thanks Yingzhen.
Hesham
On Tue, Nov 5, 2024, 4:42 PM Yingzhen Qu wrote:
> Hi Hesham,
>
> It depends on the consensus of the problem scope. If the solution turns
> out to be an extension to an existing WG, it will be sent to the WG of that
> protocol. If from the problem statement we can see the
Hi Hesham,
It depends on the consensus of the problem scope. If the solution turns out
to be an extension to an existing WG, it will be sent to the WG of that
protocol. If from the problem statement we can see the topic is too big for
any existing WG to pick up, we'd suggest the creation of a new
Hi Yingzhen,
In the new text you say: "Incubating new routing-related technologies by
developing and discussing problem statements and requirements documents,
prior to determining whether there is consensus or not for the creation of
a new working group. Initial topics include, but are not limited
Hi Adrian,
Thanks for the feedback. Please see my answers below inline.
Thanks,
Yingzhen
On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 3:47 PM Adrian Farrel wrote:
> [Sorry for breaking the threading, but I lost the original email]
>
>
>
> Hi chairs,
>
>
>
> Thanks for circulating the charter update proposal.
>
>
>
