I have one minor additional tweak suggested to Greg's change. I think once we
converge on this point, I'll do the document shepherd report and submit to the
IESG.
> On Oct 18, 2021, at 8:47 PM, Greg Mirsky wrote:
>
> Hi Robert and the Authors,
> thank you for your kind consideration of my co
Jeff,
I have already added that text based on your previous comments. Is what is
added not sufficient ?
Many thx,
R.
PS. I will add Greg's suggestions latter today and repost to -05.
"
When on the passive side Unsolicited BFD sessions goes down an
implementation MAY keep such session state for
Robert,
Greg has suggested a minor change to your most recent text.
I have added a comment to Greg's suggestion. (See below.)
You have addressed all of the other comments previously requested in my post on
15 October.
-- Jeff
> On Oct 19, 2021, at 9:19 AM, Robert Raszuk wrote:
>
> Jeff,
>
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Bidirectional Forwarding Detection WG of the
IETF.
Title : Unsolicited BFD for Sessionless Applications
Authors : Enke Chen
