Robert, Greg has suggested a minor change to your most recent text. I have added a comment to Greg's suggestion. (See below.)
You have addressed all of the other comments previously requested in my post on 15 October. -- Jeff > On Oct 19, 2021, at 9:19 AM, Robert Raszuk <rob...@raszuk.net> wrote: > > Jeff, > > I have already added that text based on your previous comments. Is what is > added not sufficient ? > > Many thx, > R. > > PS. I will add Greg's suggestions latter today and repost to -05. > > " > > When on the passive side Unsolicited BFD sessions goes down an > implementation MAY keep such session state for a configurable amount > of time. Temporarily keeping such local state may permit retrieving > additional operational information of such session which went down. > > > On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 3:07 PM Jeffrey Haas <jh...@pfrc.org > <mailto:jh...@pfrc.org>> wrote: > I have one minor additional tweak suggested to Greg's change. I think once > we converge on this point, I'll do the document shepherd report and submit to > the IESG. > > >> On Oct 18, 2021, at 8:47 PM, Greg Mirsky <gregimir...@gmail.com >> <mailto:gregimir...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Hi Robert and the Authors, >> thank you for your kind consideration of my comments and for addressing them >> so thoughtfully. I have two editorial suggestions that can be used, if you >> decide so, at a later date: >> as the text refers to the format of a BFD control message, then it seems >> appropriate to s/"Discriminator"/"My Discriminator" >> Minor re-wording: >> OLD TEXT: >> When on the passive side Unsolicited BFD sessions goes down an >> implementation MAY keep such session state for a configurable amount >> of time. Temporarily keeping such local state may permit retrieving >> additional operational information of such session which went down. >> NEW TEXT: >> When a session goes down on the passive side of an Unsolicited BFD, >> an implementation MAY keep such a state for a configurable amount of >> time. Temporarily keeping such a local state may permit retrieving >> additional operational information of such session which went down. > > When an Unsolicted BFD session goes down, implementations MAY retain > the session state for a period of time, which may be configurable. Retaining > this state can be useful for operational purposes. > > -- Jeff
