The BFD WG has placed draft-cw-bfd-unaffiliated-echo in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

2020-08-04 Thread IETF Secretariat
The BFD WG has placed draft-cw-bfd-unaffiliated-echo in state Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Jeffrey Haas) The document is available at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cw-bfd-unaffiliated-echo/

Adoption call for draft-cw-bfd-unaffiliated-echo (ending 16 August, 2020)

2020-08-04 Thread Jeffrey Haas
Working Group, https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cw-bfd-unaffiliated-echo/ At the virtual IETF 108, Unaffiliated BFD Echo Function was presented. This is a followup of a presentation given at IETF 106. The authors have indicated they would like to have this work adopted by the BFD WG. Thi

Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited (ending 16 August, 2020)

2020-08-04 Thread Jeffrey Haas
Working Group, https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited/ With apologies to the authors of BFD unsolicited, this document is past due for Working Group Last Call. The primary holdup on the document had been last minute interaction with the RFC Editor with regard to its impact o

Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited (ending 16 August, 2020)

2020-08-04 Thread Acee Lindem (acee)
I've read the document (more than once) and support publication. It is a very simple BFD extension that simplifies deployment for the use cases enumerated in the "Introduction". I have one editorial comments: Can you use phasing other than "initiates BFD control packets"? Perhaps, "initi

Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited (ending 16 August, 2020)

2020-08-04 Thread Acee Lindem (acee)
Note that I also reviewed the YANG model for the extensions and don't have any issues. I was a little surprised to see two features but I can't see a better way to support global configuration AND/OR interface configuration. On 8/4/20, 10:09 AM, "Acee Lindem (acee)" wrote: I've read the

Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited (ending 16 August, 2020)

2020-08-04 Thread Greg Mirsky
Dear Authors, et al., thank you for this well-written document. The mechanism described in the draft is, in my opinion, useful and will save considerable efforts of the operator. I have several questions and comments listed below: - Would the introduction of Unsolicited mode make this draft upd

Re:Adoption call for draft-cw-bfd-unaffiliated-echo (ending 16 August,2020)

2020-08-04 Thread xiao.min2
Hi all, I support WG adoption of this draft (as co-author). At the same time, I support to change its status to Proposed Standard, and add tag of "Updates RFC5880". Best Regards, Xiao Min 原始邮件 发件人:JeffreyHaas 收件人:rtg-bfd@ietf.org ; 日 期 :2020年08月04日 21:04 主 题 :Adoption call

Re: Adoption call for draft-cw-bfd-unaffiliated-echo (ending 16 August, 2020)

2020-08-04 Thread Greg Mirsky
Dear Authors, thank you for the well-written document. I have several questions and comments that are listed below: - An Introduction, states that it is not clear whether the devices using echo function need to support the full BFD procotol, including maintaining the state machine of