I've read the document (more than once) and support publication. It is a very
simple BFD extension that simplifies deployment for the use cases enumerated in
the "Introduction".
I have one editorial comments:
Can you use phasing other than "initiates BFD control packets"? Perhaps,
"initiates a new BFD session" or "begins sending BFD control packets"?
Thanks,
Acee
On 8/4/20, 9:10 AM, "Rtg-bfd on behalf of Jeffrey Haas"
<rtg-bfd-boun...@ietf.org on behalf of jh...@pfrc.org> wrote:
Working Group,
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited/
With apologies to the authors of BFD unsolicited, this document is past due
for Working Group Last Call. The primary holdup on the document had been
last minute interaction with the RFC Editor with regard to its impact on the
BFD Yang model. That work had completed some time ago. (The Yang model,
however, is still lingering in MISREF state.)
This begins a last call period ending on 16 August.
Please send your comments to the mailing list whether you think this work is
ready to advance to the IESG or not.
-- Jeff & Reshad
