Hi Reshad,
thank you for the great suggestion. Below is the proposed update to section
4.3.1 New State Variables:
OLD TEXT
This variable is only pertinent when bfd.SessionType is
MultipointTail.
NEW TEXT
This variable is only pertinent when bfd.SessionType is
Greg, this is good.
Regards,
Reshad.
From: "gregory.mir...@ztetx.com"
Date: Wednesday, February 7, 2018 at 11:58 PM
To: "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)"
Cc: "rtg-bfd@ietf.org" , "gregimir...@gmail.com"
Subject: Re: WGLC for BFD Multipoint documents (last round)
Hi Reshad,
thank you for the great
Hi Reshad,
thank you for your consideration. I've came across what looks as simple
editorial change. Appreciate your comment.
In the second paragraph of section 4.8 Packet consumption on tails the following
For multipoint LSPs, when IP/UDP encapsulation of BFD control packets
is used, M
Reminder, WGLC ends tomorrow.
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 01:22:07PM -0500, Jeffrey Haas wrote:
> Working Group,
>
> The authors of the BFD Yang module have declared their work on that document
> complete. Thus, working group last call is in progress for this document.
> Please provide your hopefull
Hi, Greg,
When looking for this specific sentence, I got a chance to scan through the
document a bit.
It seems to me there are still a number of editorials and potentially
non-editorials to be fixed.
Looking at S4.8 only:
BFD packets received on tails for an IP multicast group MUST be
c
Greg, I agree “MUST use” doesn’t read well. s/use/expect/ is good with me.
Regards,
Reshad.
From: "gregory.mir...@ztetx.com"
Date: Thursday, February 8, 2018 at 12:14 AM
To: "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)"
Cc: "rtg-bfd@ietf.org"
Subject: Re: WGLC for BFD Multipoint documents (last round)
Hi Reshad
