Re: IPR call for draft-nitish-vrrp-bfd-p2p

2017-12-15 Thread Colin Docherty
Hi All, As a co-author of this draft, I am not aware of any IPR associated with this draft. Many thanks, Colin Docherty i...@doch.org.uk On Fri, 15 Dec 2017 at 00:11 Aditya Dogra (addogra) wrote: > Hi All, > >As a co-author of this draft , I am not aware of any IPR associate

[Technical Errata Reported] RFC5880 (5205)

2017-12-15 Thread RFC Errata System
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5880, "Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD)". -- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5205 -- Type: Technical Reported by: Dave

[Errata Verified] RFC5884 (5085)

2017-12-15 Thread RFC Errata System
The following errata report has been verified for RFC5884, "Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) for MPLS Label Switched Paths (LSPs)". -- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5085 ---

RE: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5884 (5085)

2017-12-15 Thread BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A
Hi Kireeti, Other than doing a revised RFC, this is the (only) way to correct an error, then when the RFC is revised, all the errata need to be included/reviewed. As for implementers, the current Errata is shown as a hyperlink next to the RFC number. Hopefully, an implementer (and all users) ch

Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5884 (5085)

2017-12-15 Thread Greg Mirsky
Hi Deborah, et. al, I agree with the final text though I cannot agree with the Notes where stating: Technically, the reply cannot be optional, because the egress needs to report LSP-Ping verification status to the ingress. The proposed text recommends to include BFD discriminator in the reply. Thi

RE: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5884 (5085)

2017-12-15 Thread BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A
Hi Greg, As the notes reflect the submitter’s rationale for the errata, I didn’t think it would be appropriate for me to revise. Then probably best to do a reject and do another errata. So I prefaced it by marking it as the “Submitter”. And then put “Verifier” to reflect the outcome of the disc

Re: WGLC for BFD Multipoint documents (last round)

2017-12-15 Thread Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
Dear Greg, It appears these comments are not addressed: https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtg-bfd/current/msg03475.html Best, Sent from my iPad On Dec 15, 2017, at 11:05 AM, Greg Mirsky mailto:gregimir...@gmail.com>> wrote: Dear All, attached please find diff and the new draft-ietf-bfd-mu

Re: WGLC for BFD Multipoint documents (last round)

2017-12-15 Thread Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
Hi, Greg, It seems the comments regarding bfd.SessionType are not addressed: https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtg-bfd/current/msg03475.html Thanks, Sent from my iPad On Dec 15, 2017, at 5:15 PM, Greg Mirsky mailto:gregimir...@gmail.com>> wrote: Dear All, attached please find diffs and th