Hi, Greg, It seems the comments regarding bfd.SessionType are not addressed: https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtg-bfd/current/msg03475.html
Thanks, Sent from my iPad On Dec 15, 2017, at 5:15 PM, Greg Mirsky <gregimir...@gmail.com<mailto:gregimir...@gmail.com>> wrote: Dear All, attached please find diffs and the updated version of the draft-ietf-bfd-multipoint-active-tail. All changes are editorial. Please review changes and share your comments. Regards, Greg On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 11:24 AM, Jeffrey Haas <jh...@pfrc.org<mailto:jh...@pfrc.org>> wrote: Working Group, In an attempt to give our AD a holiday gift, we're at the point where we may now work to conclude WGLC on the BFD multipoint documents. We did one pass of last call June-July of this year, and held off approval pending review from ALU who has an implementation of the base spec. ALU has since responded that they're fine with the contents. To provide the working group one last opportunity to review the documents, we're running a final last call and will send off the changes to our AD afterward. The prior WGLC thread is here: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/yDOFOpd9BIIKtLniDGdqPioSt_w/?qid=2d0831389d19508c66f9a387096250e6 The documents are here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfd-multipoint/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfd-multipoint-active-tail/ The intent is to conclude this WGLC at end of year. -- Jeff <draft-ietf-bfd-multipoint-active-tail-06.txt> <Diff_ draft-ietf-bfd-multipoint-active-tail-05.txt - draft-ietf-bfd-multipoint-active-tail-06.txt.html>
