Re: WG Adoption for draft-chen-bfd-unsolicted

2018-11-21 Thread Jeffrey Haas
Working Group, After discussing this with Reshad, the consensus is we have enough interest to proceed in working group adoption. Authors, please re-submit your draft as draft-ietf-bfd-unsolicited. -- Jeff On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 11:52:32AM -0400, Jeffrey Haas wrote: > Working Group, > > Review

Re: WG Adoption for draft-chen-bfd-unsolicted

2018-10-30 Thread Naiming Shen (naiming)
essage- >> From: Naiming Shen (naiming) >> Sent: Monday, October 29, 2018 6:58 PM >> To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) >> Cc: Jeffrey Haas ; rtg-bfd@ietf.org; draft-chen-bfd- >> unsolici...@ietf.org >> Subject: Re: WG Adoption for draft-chen-bfd-unsolicted >>

RE: WG Adoption for draft-chen-bfd-unsolicted

2018-10-29 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
) > Sent: Monday, October 29, 2018 6:58 PM > To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) > Cc: Jeffrey Haas ; rtg-bfd@ietf.org; draft-chen-bfd- > unsolici...@ietf.org > Subject: Re: WG Adoption for draft-chen-bfd-unsolicted > > > I’m not aware of an implementation taking in the inbound BFD

Re: WG Adoption for draft-chen-bfd-unsolicted

2018-10-29 Thread Naiming Shen (naiming)
y Haas >> Sent: Monday, October 29, 2018 8:53 AM >> To: rtg-bfd@ietf.org >> Cc: draft-chen-bfd-unsolici...@ietf.org >> Subject: WG Adoption for draft-chen-bfd-unsolicted >> >> Working Group, >> >> Reviewing my notes, I was remiss in sending

RE: WG Adoption for draft-chen-bfd-unsolicted

2018-10-29 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
t: WG Adoption for draft-chen-bfd-unsolicted > > Working Group, > > Reviewing my notes, I was remiss in sending out an adoption request for > draft-chen-bfd-unsolicted (Unsolicited BFD for Sessionless Applications). > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-bfd-unsolicited/

Re: WG Adoption for draft-chen-bfd-unsolicted

2018-10-29 Thread Jeff Tantsura
Yes/support Makes sense, in Redback times we had a design to build it that way (never did though), not an IPR disclosure . Cheers, Jeff On Oct 29, 2018, 2:32 PM -0700, Naiming Shen (naiming) , wrote: > > Support as a co-author. > > Regards, > - Naiming > > > On Oct 29, 2018, at 8:52 AM, Jeffrey

Re: WG Adoption for draft-chen-bfd-unsolicted

2018-10-29 Thread Naiming Shen (naiming)
Support as a co-author. Regards, - Naiming > On Oct 29, 2018, at 8:52 AM, Jeffrey Haas wrote: > > Working Group, > > Reviewing my notes, I was remiss in sending out an adoption request for > draft-chen-bfd-unsolicted (Unsolicited BFD for Sessionless Applications). > > https://datatracker.ie

Re: WG Adoption for draft-chen-bfd-unsolicted

2018-10-29 Thread Acee Lindem (acee)
Hi Jeff, I have read the draft and support WG adoption. Thanks, Acee On 10/29/18, 11:53 AM, "Rtg-bfd on behalf of Jeffrey Haas" wrote: Working Group, Reviewing my notes, I was remiss in sending out an adoption request for draft-chen-bfd-unsolicted (Unsolicited BFD for Session

WG Adoption for draft-chen-bfd-unsolicted

2018-10-29 Thread Jeffrey Haas
Working Group, Reviewing my notes, I was remiss in sending out an adoption request for draft-chen-bfd-unsolicted (Unsolicited BFD for Sessionless Applications). https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-bfd-unsolicited/ This relatively minor change from the RFC 5880 spec is implemented by at l