Yes/support Makes sense, in Redback times we had a design to build it that way (never did though), not an IPR disclosure .
Cheers, Jeff On Oct 29, 2018, 2:32 PM -0700, Naiming Shen (naiming) <naim...@cisco.com>, wrote: > > Support as a co-author. > > Regards, > - Naiming > > > On Oct 29, 2018, at 8:52 AM, Jeffrey Haas <jh...@pfrc.org> wrote: > > > > Working Group, > > > > Reviewing my notes, I was remiss in sending out an adoption request for > > draft-chen-bfd-unsolicted (Unsolicited BFD for Sessionless Applications). > > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-bfd-unsolicited/ > > > > This relatively minor change from the RFC 5880 spec is implemented by at > > least one vendor for static route configuration. Its security > > considerations already cover what I believe to be the main concern with the > > procedural change. > > > > There's a minor point to resolve regarding the document's status - currently > > Informational - with our AD. > > > > Please indicate whether you'd support adopting this draft as a Working Group > > document. > > > > Authors, please indicate if you're aware of any applicable IPR on it. > > > > This adoption request will also end on Friday, November 9, IETF 103 Friday. > > > > -- Jeff & Reshad >
