I don’t understand the point of the change (which is also grammatically
incorrect.)
—Dave
> On Jan 15, 2022, at 7:01 AM, RFC Errata System
> wrote:
>
> [External Email. Be cautious of content]
>
>
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5880,
> "Bidirectional Forwarding Dete
-rfc-editor
-dward’s old address
This erratum proposes changing “is not equal” to “is not match”. As far as I
can tell would make the text less, not more, precise. I’m going to reject it.
Submitter, if you still feel there is a problem, you can either open a new
erratum expressing your point mo
