I don’t understand the point of the change (which is also grammatically 
incorrect.)

—Dave

> On Jan 15, 2022, at 7:01 AM, RFC Errata System <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> [External Email. Be cautious of content]
> 
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5880,
> "Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD)".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6818__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!Ra5HUkg5sPHd17WHgnWnUr4pI3dlhgQPO6rUvJ3rHV3CvdecLxi_nliiBbmKOx8$
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Nikolai Malykh <[email protected]>
> 
> Section: 6.7.2
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
>      If the Auth Len field is not equal to the length of the password
>      selected by the key ID, plus three, the packet MUST be discarded.
> 
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>      If the Auth Len field is not match to the length of the password
>      selected by the key ID, plus three, the packet MUST be discarded.
> 
> 
> Notes
> -----
> The value of the Auth Len field is the length of the password plus 3.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC5880 (draft-ietf-bfd-base-11)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD)
> Publication Date    : June 2010
> Author(s)           : D. Katz, D. Ward
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Bidirectional Forwarding Detection
> Area                : Routing
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG

Reply via email to