Sends files when I don't think it should

2008-02-02 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
Hi, I've got one thats really stumping me... rsync 2.6.9 from FreeBSD ports on both ends. /usr/local/tmp/rsync --dry-run -v -v -v -v -v -v -v -v -v -v -v -v --dry-run -vrlptHDgozxS --partial --force --delete --numeric-ids --exclude='A/*' --include='*/' /usr/local/etc/machines/ [EMAIL

Re: Sends files when I don't think it should

2008-02-05 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
> > On Sat, Feb 02, 2008 at 08:12:20PM -0500, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote: > > /usr/local/tmp/rsync --dry-run -v -v -v -v -v -v -v -v -v -v -v -v > > --dry-run -vrlptHDgozxS --partial --force --delete --numeric-ids > > --exclude='A/*' --include='*/' /u

Archive of "bad" things during rsync?

2008-05-30 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
Hi, Wouldn't you know, I can't get rsync to throw an error during a copy. :) I need to put together some instructions for a guy that runs a WISP for him to look over before weekly backups are made (I'll be copying the files to /dev/null so any read errors can be caught). I can do

Re: Archive of "bad" things during rsync?

2008-05-30 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
> On Fri, 2008-05-30 at 12:16 -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote: > > Wouldn't you know, I can't get rsync to throw an error during > > a copy. :) I need to put together some instructions for a guy that runs > > a WISP for him to look over before weekly backups ar

Step between --dry-run and running?

2008-05-31 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
Hi, Is there either a step, or a recipe for a step between --dry-run and actually running? In a particular instance, --dry-run isn't enough. I want to actually attempt to read the entire file in, but then write it out to nowhere. I'm trying to see if it generates any disk errors t

Re: Step between --dry-run and running?

2008-05-31 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
> On Sat, 2008-05-31 at 14:35 -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote: > > Is there either a step, or a recipe for a step between > > --dry-run and actually running? > >=20 > > In a particular instance, --dry-run isn't enough. I want > > to actually attemp

Re: Step between --dry-run and running?

2008-06-01 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
> > On Sat, 2008-05-31 at 18:16 -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote: > > > That would be --only-write-batch. > > =20 > > Hrm, so it does But creates a $FILE.sh filename. Any > > way to prevent that part? > > No. If you don't want the $FILE.sh, ju