> On Sat, 2008-05-31 at 14:35 -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
> > Is there either a step, or a recipe for a step between
> > --dry-run and actually running?
> >=20
> > In a particular instance, --dry-run isn't enough. I want
> > to actually attempt to read the entire file in, but then write
> > it out to nowhere. I'm trying to see if it generates any disk
> > errors that may hurt during an actual transfer.
>
> That would be --only-write-batch.
>
Hrm, so it does.... But creates a $FILE.sh filename. Any
way to prevent that part? Also, should running it twice in a row
quickly produce 2 files that should diff the same, or is something
stored in there that would prevent a diff from being the same?
(Timestamp, etc)
Thanks, Tuc
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
