https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10263
Claudius Ellsel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||claudius.ell...@live.de
--- Comment #1 f
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294
Claudius Ellsel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||claudius.ell...@live.de
--- Comment #28 f
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294
--- Comment #29 from Claudius Ellsel ---
As another motivation for this, I use rsync for backups and would like to be
able to see whether files have just been renamed or were deleted and some
others newly created (which currently cannot be distingui
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10263
--- Comment #2 from Haravikk ---
It's certainly similar but I wouldn't say a direct duplicate; 2294 is
requesting detection of move/rename *somehow* which is a tricky proposition
(especially with rsync defaulting towards incremental send rather tha
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10263
--- Comment #3 from Claudius Ellsel ---
I have to admit that I only skimmed through the description. There is
definitely some more to this than in the other bug.
Have a look at https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294#c14 though. The
patche
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294
--- Comment #30 from elatl...@gmail.com ---
This feature request is so old it has lost relavence because btrfs/zfs/etc are
more optimal backup solutions than rsync.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
--
Ple
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8367
Claudius Ellsel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||claudius.ell...@live.de
--- Comment #7 fr
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294
--- Comment #31 from Claudius Ellsel ---
To me and others it still seems relevant.
I have to admit though that I haven't looked much into other solutions for
backups like btrfs send/receive commands. I suppose that were the ones you
meant? Note tha
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294
--- Comment #32 from elatl...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Claudius Ellsel from comment #31)
Yes any COW FS with "send/receive" will have inherent rename handaling, and
will be faster than rsync because the diffs are inherent. With zfs one can even
hav
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 1:33 PM CRTS via rsync
wrote:
> then the empty directory does end up in bkp.
>
You mean "does not". That is correct, as it only creates backup dirs to
hold backup files. I recall this being specifically chosen as the desired
outcome but not the details of why (since it w
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294
--- Comment #33 from Claudius Ellsel ---
Hm, those backups won't work on file level, though afaik. Thus I cannot easily
access files on a backup drive for example. Also I want to use this as some
kind of confirm stage a bit like committing with git
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294
--- Comment #34 from elatl...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Claudius Ellsel from comment #33)
Yes you can easily access files on a COW-FS backup; it's a file system, that's
what it's for.
If you want to review changes before backup you can just diff or
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294
--- Comment #35 from Claudius Ellsel ---
(In reply to elatllat from comment #34)
>Yes you can easily access files on a COW-FS backup; it's a file system, that's
>>what it's for.
This is going off-topic, but my backup drive is NTFS currently, which
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294
--- Comment #36 from elatl...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Claudius Ellsel from comment #35)
> This is going off-topic
On such an old bug with modern workarouds I think it's worth talking about.
> backup drive is NTFS currently, which would complicat
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294
--- Comment #37 from elatl...@gmail.com ---
The btrfs equivalent is a bit more rough but (link for rename);
#./btrfs-snapshots-diff.py -sb -p /media/btrfs/v_1/s_1 -c /media/btrfs/v_1/s_2
| grep -E path=. | grep -v utimes | tail -n +2
link;path=fileB
15 matches
Mail list logo
