https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294
--- Comment #32 from elatl...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Claudius Ellsel from comment #31) Yes any COW FS with "send/receive" will have inherent rename handaling, and will be faster than rsync because the diffs are inherent. With zfs one can even have encrypted backups without the backup server ever seeing the key or un-encrypted data. COW is not good for databases, VM imgs, etc but that's not where rename detection is useful either. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
