Re: post-xfer exec -- more juice!

2006-09-09 Thread Wayne Davison
On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 12:42:16PM +0800, Mike Daws wrote: > Am I missing some trivial way to give this information to a post-exec > script? The easiest thing to do with the current system is to use some kind of caching mechanism in the pre-xfer exec to note the RSYNC_REQUEST string for use in the

Re: post-xfer exec -- more juice!

2006-09-09 Thread Wayne Davison
On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 09:55:13AM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote: > I personally think that option 2 is a good choice and could be put into > the current code without too much difficulty. No, now that I think about it, there would be a problem with the process waiting that needs to happen. Since we

Re: --delete option does not always work

2006-09-09 Thread Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
Hi, Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK, I had a free moment to work up a fix, and here it is. It was > pretty simple. I'm sorry to wake this up again, but it seems not to be so simple to fix at all :) I've stumbled over this while noticing that the rsnapshot backup of my root-filesyst

Re: --delete option does not always work

2006-09-09 Thread Wayne Davison
On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 09:00:10PM +0200, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# rsync -HSaxvn --delete --relative / > /mnt/rsnapshot/daily.0/darkside/root | grep -c ^deleting > 0 This is a different bug that was recently fixed: using --relative with a root (/) filesystem and --de

Re: --delete option does not always work

2006-09-09 Thread Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 12:22:57PM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote: > This is a different bug that was recently fixed: using --relative with > a root (/) filesystem and --delete was also failing to delete. The > latest CVS source and recent nightly tar files have this fixed. Here's > the bug (which h