On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 09:55:13AM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote: > I personally think that option 2 is a good choice and could be put into > the current code without too much difficulty.
No, now that I think about it, there would be a problem with the process waiting that needs to happen. Since we can only wait on a child's exit status, the main-rsync pid must be the child of the post-xfer process, and the pre-xfer process must be a child of the main-rsync process, so they can't share a process. ..wayne.. -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
