Nevermind this message. The issue is a platform utility malfunctioning. Not an
rsync issue.
Randall S. Becker, Managing Director, Nexbridge Inc.
+1.416.984.9826
From: Randall S. Becker
Sent: September 22, 2020 3:30 PM
To: 'rsync@lists.samba.org'
Subject: [Test Problem] R
Hi!
I’ve encountered a weird test failure at commit 15bc7ded
PASS00-hello
rm: cannot remove '... /testtmp/00-hello': Directory not empty
I have not seen this in prior commits. Any ideas on what I can look?
Thanks,
Randall
-- Brief whoami:
NonStop devel
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13241
Wayne Davison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13241
--- Comment #2 from Michal Ruprich ---
Thanks for the answer Dave, I filed this bug a few days before the 3.1.3
version came out. I was trying the make check with 3.1.2 release and there it
was failing. With the new version this test passes
Gordon ---
When I run "make check" (version 3.1.3) the xattrs test reports
Running .../rsync/rsync -aiX -f-x_system.* -f-x_security.* --fake-super
--link-dest=../chk . ../to
which appears to be specifically excluding copying any system.* or security.*
xattrs in --fake-super mode (and t
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13241
Bug ID: 13241
Summary: A problem with test for xattrs transfer
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.2
Hardware: x86
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
in our case forgot musl's users)
by a single feature test that all C libraries have to implement in order to
have a compiling rsync with IPv6 support.
After applying this patch, I was able to compile an IPv6 ready rsync with musl,
while keeping the same behaviour with the glibc under Linux. This
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10715
Summary: IPv6 configure test fails on musl c-library
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.1
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10179
Wayne Davison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10179
--- Comment #1 from chd...@gmail.com 2013-10-03 02:54:49 UTC ---
I apologize: it turns out that it IS homebrew's fault, and they just fixed it.
The reason it always worked before is because they used to not have temp dirs
that start with hyphens; t
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10179
Summary: massive test failure on OSX 10.8.5 under Homebrew
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.0
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8268
Wayne Davison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8268
Summary: Wrong unchanged_attrs test for symlink ownership
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.0
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7667
way...@samba.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7667
Summary: "devices" regression test fails on x86_64-apple-darwin10
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.0
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Mac OS X
Status: NEW
Severi
Posted a message earlier, seen others since but not mine. Test post to
see if this makes it to the list or not.
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http
e"), although I do have group-write permissions, so touch etc.
should be possible...
if I do a "chown -R koenig rsync-source" those two failures do not show up
anymore
(though these tests should be able to correctly handle this ?!)
here is the build/test log and the output of "find
This is a test of the new list configuration as announced by Wayne today.
This is only a test.
Matt
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http
rsync error on two test www.dwhs.net servers
rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(359)
Also both of these two servers have locked out all root access remitly. I
dont think they have been hacked, but I can seem to get access without going
in single user and adding a
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5440
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
r/baz/three
drwxr-xr-x DIR /##/## ##:##:## foo
! -rw-r--r-- 4 /##/## ##:##:## foo/one
test 2 failed
- daemon log ends
- daemon rsyncd.log follows
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5440
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from [EM
On cygwin 1.5.25 we get the following test failure:-
- default-acls log follows
Testing for symlinks using 'test -h'
sending incremental file list
created directory /tmp/rsync-3.0.3pre2/testtmp/default-acls/da777/to
delta-transmission disabled for local transfer or --whole-file
fi
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5440
Summary: 'relative' test fails on SunOs 5.8
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.2
Platform: Sparc
OS/Version: SunOS
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Pr
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5381
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5381
--- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-11 12:58 CST ---
try to run "make test" as root
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
Y
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-10 09:53 CST ---
That test is doing a daemon-over-remote-shell test using a shell script as a
pretend "remote shell" to do a transfer with the localhost. This expects the
rsyncd.conf file to be in the current directory of the test run, and does not
nee
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5381
Summary: make test fails without /etc/rsyncd.conf
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
I have also been eager to test bbouncer
The latest source passes with flying colours!
but make check finds some problems with xattrs if not run by sudo
I have xattr in /usr/local/bin/ from the source found at:
http://dev.bignerdranch.com/public/bnr/eXttra.zip
What I did:
cd /usr/local/Source
> See the recent thread with the "congrats" subject that discusses this.
sorry, the messages was not in the archive yet
Making those changes you'll get 100% success in bbouncer.
confirmed
Thanks for the fine work!
Cheers,
Axel.
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/ma
On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 08:48:45PM +0100, Axel Rose wrote:
> I was eager to test the fresh release with MacOS X using "bbouncer"
See the recent thread with the "congrats" subject that discusses this.
I mention an option you're missing (--force-change) and also post
Hello all,
I was eager to test the fresh release with MacOS X using "bbouncer"
This is how I compiled and run the tests:
patch -p1 http://www.n8gray.org/blog/2007/04/27/introducing-backup-bouncer/>
./bbouncer create-vol mysource
./bbouncer create-vol mybackup
sudo rm
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5297
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #1
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5297
Summary: merge test fails
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.0
Platform: Other
OS/Version: SunOS
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: core
Hi,
I tried to build rsync-3.0.0pre4 on a list of different plattforms
and got some problems with build or test suite.
first, the good news: the build and tests worked fine on these plattforms
Solaris 5.5.1, 5.6 and 5.8 (sparc) and 5.10 (x86 and sparc)
SUSE Linux 9.0 (amd64
On 7/12/07, Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 06:31:59PM -0400, Warren Oates wrote:
> The exclude test fails on OS X Darwin Kernel Version 8.10.1
> RELEASE_I386. It just hangs there until CTL-C.
It could hang on other architectures too, but was spora
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 06:31:59PM -0400, Warren Oates wrote:
> The exclude test fails on OS X Darwin Kernel Version 8.10.1
> RELEASE_I386. It just hangs there until CTL-C.
It could hang on other architectures too, but was sporadic. I just
checked-in a fix and released a new "nightl
Version 3.0.0cvs protocol version 30.PR4
Capabilities:
64-bit files, 32-bit inums, 32-bit timestamps, 64-bit long ints,
socketpairs, hardlinks, symlinks, IPv6, batchfiles, inplace,
append, no ACLs, xattrs, iconv
The exclude test fails on OS X Darwin Kernel Version 8.10.1
RELEASE_I386
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Sorry for the noise! If this ends up on the mailing list, please ignore
this...
..wayne..
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
interest me and whice would slow down my cycles.
No, with my proposed command, rsync will still send only the single
file because its name is still given in the *source* path:
rsync -av --timeout 120 /home/20070129_1012/status.csv --port 5873 \
fileserver::test/20070129_1012/
This comm
mand, rsync will still send only the single
file because its name is still given in the *source* path:
rsync -av --timeout 120 /home/20070129_1012/status.csv --port 5873 \
fileserver::test/20070129_1012/
This command has exactly the same effect as your original command,
except that t
t; wrote:
On 1/29/07, Shai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> + rsync -av --timeout 120 /home/20070129_1012/status.csv --port 5873
> fileserver::test/20070129_1012/status.csv
> rsync: mkstemp "/20070129_1012/.status.csv.IWS933" (in
> test) failed: No such file or directory (
On 1/29/07, Shai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+ rsync -av --timeout 120 /home/20070129_1012/status.csv --port 5873
fileserver::test/20070129_1012/status.csv
rsync: mkstemp "/20070129_1012/.status.csv.IWS933" (in
test) failed: No such file or directory (2)
Since you want the
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 04:20:34PM +0200, Shai wrote:
> rsync: mkstemp "/20070129_1012/.status.csv.IWS933" (in test) failed: No such
> file or directory (2)
That's an OS error that tells you that your directory is missing. Why
that happens is most likely outside the scope
i'd appreciate any help here please :)
On 1/29/07, Shai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
---
+ rsync -av --timeout 120 /home/20070129_1012/status.csv --port 5873
fileserver::test/20070129_1012/status.csv
building file list ... done
status.csv
rsync: mkstemp "/20070129_1012/.s
Hi,
---
+ rsync -av --timeout 120 /home/20070129_1012/status.csv --port 5873
fileserver::test/20070129_1012/status.csv
building file list ... done
status.csv
rsync: mkstemp "/20070129_1012/.status.csv.IWS933" (in test) failed: No such
file or directory (2)
sent 347 bytes receive
On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 02:34:28PM -0500, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> CVS rsync is failing the fuzzy test intermittently on my computer.
Yeah, I had seen that too on sporadic occasions. It was the
--delete-delay option causing a problem with the new incremental
recursion mode. The fix was pre
CVS rsync is failing the fuzzy test intermittently on my computer.
The log is attached. I'm guessing rsync isn't retouching directory
times when it should.
Matt
Testing for symlinks using 'test -h'
Running: "/home/matt/rsync/rsync/rsync -avvi --no-whole-file --fuzzy
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 01:43:38PM -0800, Hugh Daniel wrote:
> A bit of research show that no one has mentioned this test since it
> was last worked on in late September
That's because the test works fine for most people. Apparently it only
fails when someone runs as root with a non-z
On 12/15/06, Hugh Daniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When run as root the
"chmod-option" test allays fails, and fails across many versions of
Linux, RedHat-7.3, SuSE-10.0, Debian-Etch in the same way.
[Matt snipped here and PGP-unescaped below]
drwxrwxr-x0 0.10
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Recent versions of rsync have a "regression test" called
"chmod-option" that when run fails, this should be causing rsync to be
rejected as broken by all distros and sysadmins.
A bit of research show that no one has mentione
Hi,
I am working on testing of rsync on SLES10 (2.6.16). Currently I am
looking for test parameters for testing performance of rsync. Has anyone
done performance testing on rsync ? If yes, can u plz let me know.
I was planning the following test:
Test 1: Total data size is 1GB. And 10% of
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Hi!
Just testing, sorry for the inconvenience.
Richard Taubo
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3764
--- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-07 19:17 MST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> But where is the iconv.diff file?
Did you try googling for "rsync iconv.diff"? (You would have found it in the
first item returned.) Because the
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3764
--- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-07 16:41 MST ---
Thanks for the quick reply. I can live with option (3). But where is the
iconv.diff file? I couldn't find it in the CVS tree ...
A suggestion regarding this charset issue:
A
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3764
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3764
Summary: mkdir "test\#366" failed: Invalid argument (22) on Mac
OS X 10.4 (Intel)
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.8
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Mac OS X
S
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3172
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3172
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-16 14:00 ---
Michael Cramer proposed this fix:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=70804
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3172
Summary: `make test` fails when using xattr patch
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.7
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3172
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-15 20:47 ---
Created an attachment (id=1516)
--> (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=1516&action=view)
test.log
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userpre
Le Vendredi 29 Juillet 2005 04:34, Wayne Davison a écrit :
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 01:57:05AM +0200, Olivier Thauvin wrote:
> > I am trying to update our rpm to rsync 2.6.6 but one of the test
> > failed with this patch.
>
> This revealed that the acls patch was not properly
On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 01:57:05AM +0200, Olivier Thauvin wrote:
> I am trying to update our rpm to rsync 2.6.6 but one of the test
> failed with this patch.
This revealed that the acls patch was not properly reporting what files
were being updated when acls were not being preserved
In the mandriva rpm of rsync, we apply for our rpm the acl patch in the
patches directory.
I am trying to update our rpm to rsync 2.6.6 but one of the test failed with
this patch. It seems to be a minor problem, but can you have a look ?
Thanks by advance.
Following the message (a bit long
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 06:59:46PM -0500, Art Haas wrote:
> The choice of 'config.h' for testing does not consider the possiblity of
> objdir != srcdir builds. The small patch below replaces 'config.h'
> with 'configure.in' in keeping with the 'config' name choice.
Thanks! That deals with the gli
p "$srcdir/config.h" "$fromdir/foo/config2"
+cp -p "$srcdir/configure.in" "$fromdir/foo/config2"
chmod 601 "$fromdir/foo/config2"
$RSYNC -iplrH "$fromdir/" "$todir/" \
| tee "$outfile"
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@
EOT
di
Hi,
Has anyone thought of making rsync object-oriented? For instance, I just
want to slightly modify a few of its algorithms for somewhat specific backup
purposes (rdiff type logic for incrementals and pooling files for many
source machines with hardlinks - similar, but not exactly the same as,
B
hello?
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1621
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1621
Summary: test bug, please ignore
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.3
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: core
I want to register Nancy Lewis and Linda LaPlante for the fall 2004 Cgta gift show in
Toronto.
Our reference numbers are as follows
79520 Linda LaPlante
79521 Nancy Lewis
Cottonwood Kitchens
Nelson B. C.
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before p
I've just released 2.6.2pre1 to the rsync web site. Please test it to
see that it fixes the recently-reported problems from the list. The
main fix is the file-list-sorting problem when --relative is used. I've
also included several other fixes (though I've neglected to updat
On 23 Apr 2004, Jim Salter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a test message - my apologies for it, but everything I send is
> getting bounced.
Our spamfilter was a little too hasty. It should be OK now.
--
Martin
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mail
On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 11:38:10PM +, Jim Salter wrote:
> This is a test message - my apologies for it, but everything I send is
> getting bounced.
I've seen several messages from you on the list yesterday and today.
FYI.
..wayne..
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://list
This is a test message - my apologies for it, but everything I send is
getting bounced.
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 10:01:19AM +0900, Shinichi Maruyama wrote:
> This OS has sin_len in struct sockaddr_in. But after
> configure, HAVE_SOCKADDR_SIN_LEN remains undef in config.h.
> Needs patch like this ?
Yup -- much appreciated! I've checked in your fix, plus an extra
cleanup of
wayned> > So, it looks like we need 2 configure tests and separate defines for
wayned> > sa_len and sin_len.
wayned> How about the appended patch? This applies to the very latest CVS
wayned> source and would require the running of "autoconf" and "autoheader"
wayned> after applying it.
I
[Wayne Davison]
> The problem is deeper than that. The HAVE_SOCKADDR_LEN define surrounds
> both code that uses sin_len and sa_len, so your change will probably
> cause problems for other systems. So, it looks like we need 2 configure
> tests and separate defines for sa_len and sin_len.
Oh. I s
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 07:32:52PM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
> So, it looks like we need 2 configure tests and separate defines for
> sa_len and sin_len.
How about the appended patch? This applies to the very latest CVS
source and would require the running of "autoconf" and "autoheader"
after a
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 01:44:58PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> The problem is that the code in configure check for sockaddr.sa_len,
> while the code uses sockaddr.sin_len.
The problem is deeper than that. The HAVE_SOCKADDR_LEN define surrounds
both code that uses sin_len and sa_len, so yo
The last versions of rsync fail to compile on Tru64 Unix (alpha),
because of a typo in configure.in.
The problem is that the code in configure check for sockaddr.sa_len,
while the code uses sockaddr.sin_len. This patch fixes the problem.
Please include it in the next version of rsync.
diff -ur
This message was automatically generated on Sun, 01 Feb 2004 02:05:19 -0500
in response to your message originally sent with the following information:
From:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (expanded to: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Subject: test
Date
- Ceci est une réponse automatique
- suite à votre message envoyé à [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cette boîte n'existe plus.
Merci de mettre à jour votre carnet d'adresse.
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org
- Ceci est une réponse automatique
- suite à votre message envoyé à [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cette boîte n'existe plus.
Merci de mettre à jour votre carnet d'adresse.
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org
* SECURITY NOTICE *
An attachment was sent by you, in the message "test", that violates
Kimberly-Clark's E-mail security policy regarding potentially dangerous
attachments.
The offending message has been dropped and will not be delivered.
Unsafe atta
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 12:49:52PM +0100, Stefan Nehlsen wrote:
> If the directory you build rsync in differs from the sourcedir "make test"
> failes:
Thanks for pointing this out. I've checked in a fix that should now
call the wildtest program with a TESTFILE argument tha
There is a small bug in the build system of 2.6.0:
If the directory you build rsync in differs from the sourcedir "make test"
failes:
$ tar -xzf ~/rsync-2.6.0.tar.gz
$ mkdir build
$ cd build
$ ../rsync-2.6.0/configure
....
$ make test
PASSunsafe-byname
PASSun
the following steps to construct the hardlink
list (named "hlink_list") happen after the file list is received:
- An array to hold pointers to all the file list entries is allocated.
- It is initialized to each file list entry in list-order.
- It is sorted (using qsort) with a 3-part compariso
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 03:30:53PM -0800, Pete Wenzel wrote:
> The rsync 2.5.6 TODO file mentions the need for hard link test cases.
> Here is one in which a linked file is unnecessarily transferred in full.
>
> # Setup initial directories
> mkdir src dest
> dd if=/dev/
The rsync 2.5.6 TODO file mentions the need for hard link test cases.
Here is one in which a linked file is unnecessarily transferred in full.
# Setup initial directories
mkdir src dest
dd if=/dev/zero bs=1024 count=1 of=src/a 2>/dev/null
rsync -a src/. dest/.
ln src/a src/b
#
Steve Bonds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The broken ssh-basic test is fixed in the CVS version of rsync, but not in
> 2.5.6.
Yup, the ssh-basic test in the CVS version *does* work - I
just downloaded it and tried it.
>
> It should work in the next release of rsync. You can get
The broken ssh-basic test is fixed in the CVS version of rsync, but not in
2.5.6.
It should work in the next release of rsync. You can get the new test
from the rsync CVS server easily via the cvsweb interface:
http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/rsync/testsuite/ssh-basic.test?rev=1.6&con
I'm running 'make check' to run the testsuite, and I did it
this way so the ssh-basic test would run:
# export rsync_enable_ssh_tests=yes
# make check
I did set up ssh so this would run, and here's what I get
for output:
POSIXLY_CORRECT=1 TOOLDIR=`pwd` rsync_bi
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 08:00:51PM -0801, Jos Backus wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 10:19:42PM -0600, Dave Dykstra wrote:
> > The second rsync-2.5.6 pre-release version is now available at:
>
> There's the popt-1.7 update (with Dave's sprintf() workaround) at
>
> http://www.catnook.com/patc
x27;s also a corresponding '.sig' file that contains a gpg signature
of the file; the public key is available on the pgp keyservers.
Just to calm down, at least a little, the guilt I feel for not having
enough time to test rsync port... I created a "test release package",
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 10:19:42PM -0600, Dave Dykstra wrote:
> The second rsync-2.5.6 pre-release version is now available at:
There's the popt-1.7 update (with Dave's sprintf() workaround) at
http://www.catnook.com/patches/rsync-popt-1.7.diff
Perhaps we can apply this after the release as
> From: Dave Dykstra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> This is a release candidate. If no-one reports an urgent fixes within
> the next few days, it will probably become version 2.5.6.
If Martin isn't able to get my access restored to cvs.samba.org tomorrow,
I'd appreciate it if someone else could upd
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003 22:19:42 -0600
Dave Dykstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The second rsync-2.5.6 pre-release version is now available at:
>
> http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/preview/rsync-2.5.6pre2.tar.gz
> ftp://rsync.samba.org/pub/rsync/preview/rsync-2.5.6pre2.tar.gz
> rsync://r
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
