On Apr 6, 2005 8:49 AM, Jose, Tony wrote:
> Any body got a copy of compiled rsync for hp-ux 11.11?
The HP-UX porting center has 2.6.3:
http://hpux.cs.utah.edu/hppd/hpux/Networking/Admin/rsync-2.6.3/
If you choose to run 2.5.5, don't use daemon mode as there are several
security problems with th
Hello
Any body got a copy of compiled rsync for hp-ux 11.11?
I am getting lots of error during compilation...
Thanks
Tony Jose
UNIX Engineering
PepsiCo Business Solutions Group
5600 Headquarters Drive
Plano, TX 75024
Ph: (972) 963-1919
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe or change
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 01:59:37PM -0700, jw schultz wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 01:41:51PM -0700, David Norwood wrote:
> > > > Okay, with this patch I now get error messages, but it still creates
> > null
> > > > filled output files. I guess that is what you meant by "the behavior is
> > the
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 01:41:51PM -0700, David Norwood wrote:
> > > Okay, with this patch I now get error messages, but it still creates
> null
> > > filled output files. I guess that is what you meant by "the behavior is
> the
> > > same".
>
> > That is correct. At the point in which we detect
> > Okay, with this patch I now get error messages, but it still creates
null
> > filled output files. I guess that is what you meant by "the behavior is
the
> > same".
> That is correct. At the point in which we detect the
> problem there isn't anything we can do to produce
> good files. The m
On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 02:04:50PM -0700, David Norwood wrote:
> > I've had a chance to think on it. Attached is a patch that
> > allows unmap_file() to report the first read error that
> > map_ptr found. The behaviour is the same. I doubt this will
> > apply against anything but CVS HEAD as of
> I've had a chance to think on it. Attached is a patch that
> allows unmap_file() to report the first read error that
> map_ptr found. The behaviour is the same. I doubt this will
> apply against anything but CVS HEAD as of now.
>
> This should probably use FERROR instead of FINFO so that a
> p
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 11:46:51PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> jw schultz writes:
>
> > I've had a chance to think on it. Attached is a patch that
> > allows unmap_file() to report the first read error that
> > map_ptr found. The behaviour is the same. I doubt this will
> > apply against
jw schultz writes:
> I've had a chance to think on it. Attached is a patch that
> allows unmap_file() to report the first read error that
> map_ptr found. The behaviour is the same. I doubt this will
> apply against anything but CVS HEAD as of now.
>
> This should probably use FERROR instead o
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 03:08:22PM -0700, jw schultz wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 12:41:19PM -0700, David Norwood wrote:
> [reformatted because someone doesn't know how to compose email]
> > I'm using rsync to mirror files from a Windows XP machine
> > mounted via smbfs. Apparently I have some
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 12:41:19PM -0700, David Norwood wrote:
[reformatted because someone doesn't know how to compose email]
> I'm using rsync to mirror files from a Windows XP machine
> mounted via smbfs. Apparently I have something configured
> wrong as I get a "permisson denied" error accessi
I'm using rsync to mirror files from a Windows XP machine mounted via smbfs.
Apparently I have something configured wrong as I get a "permisson denied" error
accessing some of the files on the smbfs mount with cp, od, etc. However, rsync
produces no error messages on these files. It happily c
olaris 9 64bit boxes available, but I can't believe it
>they would be of
> any use for compiling for a different OS version...
> Any other idea?
>
[...]
> Loris Serena wrote:
>
> > Hello List,
> >
> > Would anybody have a precompiled version of rsync 2.5.5 for
TECTED]
Subject: Precompiled rsync 2.5.5 for SPARC Solaris 8 64bit
Hi,
Can anyone help me with this?
I cannot install gcc or make on this box, and I don't have another Solaris 8
64 bits where I could
compile it on and then copy it across!
I only have Solaris 7, or Solaris 9 64bit boxes available, bu
compiling for a different OS version...
Any other idea?
Thanks in advance,
Loris
Loris Serena wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> Would anybody have a precompiled version of rsync 2.5.5 for SPARC
> Solaris 8 64bit?
>
> Thanks in advance for your help,
>
> Loris
>
> --
>
Hello List,
Would anybody have a precompiled version of rsync 2.5.5 for SPARC
Solaris 8 64bit?
Thanks in advance for your help,
Loris
--
Loris Serena
Unix Systems Administrator
PaddyPower Bookmakers
Phone : +353-1-4049633 http://www.paddypowerplc.com
Mobile: +353-87-9683760
Hello
rsync-2.5.5 for hp-ux 11.0 is not syncing files more that 2 GB ( largefile ) .
Should i need to recompile rsync ?
Should i use any special options while compiling ?
please help.
-babu
__
The NEW Netscape 7.0 browser is
Patrick Amirian wrote:
> Hi,
> Can anyone tell me please where I can get the latest version of rsync
> for AIX ?
Download source and compile it?
Max.
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-q
Hi,
Can anyone tell me please
where I can get the latest version of rsync for AIX ?
Thank you.
Thanks for the reminder. I checked in the second version.
- Dave
On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 12:45:03PM +0300, Sviatoslav Sviridov wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 10:03:33 +0200 (CEST)
> Ruediger Oertel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > we ran into
On Wed, Dec 25, 2002 at 02:49:13PM -0800, Stephen J. Friedl wrote:
> jw schultz wrote:
>
> >If the UNIXWare compiler
> >can't handle the construct Stephen could forward the patch
> >to the libpopt project
> >
> I have posted a comment in the popt area of freshmeat where I beleve the
> popt projec
> If the UNIXWare compiler
> can't handle the construct Stephen could forward the patch
> to the libpopt project and file a bug report with SCO.
I have filed a bug report with SCO (with detail at the assembler level
to help them track it down), and I'll look into the libpopt integration
as well.
On Tue, Dec 24, 2002 at 07:26:38AM -0600, Dave Dykstra wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 23, 2002 at 11:42:07PM -0800, Jos Backus wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 23, 2002 at 02:13:51PM -0800, Stephen Friedl wrote:
> > > The change in popt/popt.c is to work around a bug in the SCO UNIXWare 8
> > > compiler: it doesn't pr
On Mon, Dec 23, 2002 at 11:42:07PM -0800, Jos Backus wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 23, 2002 at 02:13:51PM -0800, Stephen Friedl wrote:
> > The change in popt/popt.c is to work around a bug in the SCO UNIXWare 8
> > compiler: it doesn't properly deal with alloca() being called from the
> > middle of another
On Mon, Dec 23, 2002 at 02:13:51PM -0800, Stephen Friedl wrote:
> This is a patch to rsync 2.5.5, and it serves two purposes. The small
> patches to batch.c, flist.c and log.c simply add "void" to some function
> definitions so that all declarations in proto.h have f
Hello list,
This is a patch to rsync 2.5.5, and it serves two purposes. The small
patches to batch.c, flist.c and log.c simply add "void" to some function
definitions so that all declarations in proto.h have full parameter lists.
unsigned char read_batch_flags()
Message-
> From: Dave Dykstra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 12:28 PM
> To: Madole, Dave BGI SF
> Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Re: rsync 2.5.5, "unexpected tag failures", Solaris 2.6 vs.
> 2.8, "--b locking-io"
> I am syncing from a 2.6 Solaris box to a 2.8 solaris box. All are running
> rsync 2.5.5.
>
> When I sync (commands simplified for example, always using rsh):
>
> 2.8box% rsync -e rsh 2.6box:/path/path/stuff/ /path/path/newstuff/
>
> i.e., the 2.6 box is the server, I
I have an Empeg car MP3 player (http://www.empeg.com) that is
running an embedded version of Linux on a StrongARM CPU.
When using rsync 2.5.5 on Linux/ARM and rsync 2.5.5 on Linux/x86
to transfer mp3 files, it appears file are always transmitted as
a whole, even if only the timestamp differs
Hi,
I have been having a problem that seems related to previously reported
problems
but persists.
I am syncing from a 2.6 Solaris box to a 2.8 solaris box. All are running
rsync 2.5.5.
When I sync (commands simplified for example, always using rsh):
2.8box% rsync -e rsh 2.6box:/path/path
Moen
cc:
Sent by: Subject: rsync 2.5.5 port to Novell
NetWare
rsync-admin@
Hullo, all. I diligently consulted the suggested reading on the way in:
> Welcome to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list! PLEASE READ THIS
> IMPORTANT ETIQUETTE MESSAGE BEFORE POSTING:
> http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
'Twas a quick read, given that I'm the co-author. ;->
I
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 02:34:46PM +0100, Michael Schmidt wrote:
[...]
> For your (the list's) information:
>
> I have put the prebuilt binary of rsync-2.5.5 onto our ftp server at
> ftp://ftp.fh-koblenz.de/pub/PrebuiltBinaries/rsync-2.5.5/
> and have put an README
Here is the fix for the HP-UX 11.00 and 11i (11.11) large files issue with
rsync 2.5.5.
You just need to compile it 64bit. I just used the DA2.0w CFLAGS option.
export CLFAGS="-Ae +O4 +Onolimit +DS2.0 +DA2.0w"
That is it.
Matthew Carlson
--
To unsubscribe or change opt
pect anybody to ever seriously consider merging into the rsync
tree and which i wouldn't defend against claims that it could wreck
your machine, your career, your life, your mojo etc.
http://www.lpmd.org/rsync-2.5.5-acl.diff.gz
or
ftp://ftp.lpmd.org/pub/rsync-2.5.5-acl.diff.gz
(thanks, JMC, fo
config.sub, but
I would request that you pick up current copies of these. The
ones in the rsync-2.5.5 package are a year old and do not
recognize VOS (the current ones do recognize us).
These patches change some Unix types to POSIX types (u_char ->
uchar_t), hide various unused declarations on syst
hanks all
Paul
-Original Message-
From: David Starks-Browning [mailto:starksb@;ebi.ac.uk]
Sent: Friday, 8 November 2002 9:38 AM
To: Hobson, Paul
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Rsync-2.5.5 on Tru64 UNIX V51.A
Paul,
You have to regenerate configure after modifying con
Paul,
You have to regenerate configure after modifying configure.in.
The rsync folks are helpful and have an up-to-date copy of configure
as part of cvs. (Most projects only generate configure with a proper
release.) You should probably just checkout from cvs and build that.
Good luck.
David
id Starks-Browning [mailto:starksb@;ebi.ac.uk]
Sent: Thursday, 7 November 2002 9:37 PM
To: Hobson, Paul
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Rsync-2.5.5 on Tru64 UNIX V51.A
Paul, this message was big enough without also being in HTML! It was
probably flagged as spam, hence the long delay.
Paul, this message was big enough without also being in HTML! It was
probably flagged as spam, hence the long delay.
On Friday 25 Oct 02, Hobson, Paul writes:
> Hi
>
> I am trying to compile rsync-2.5.5 on Tru64 UNIX V5.1A
>
> The configure completed sucessfully however the m
Title: Rsync-2.5.5 on Tru64 UNIX V51.A
Hi
I am trying to compile rsync-2.5.5 on Tru64 UNIX V5.1A
The configure completed sucessfully however the make failed. The following is a copy of the configure and make output. Could you please provide advice as to why this is failing and hopefully
ile=main.c, line=578): entered
rsync error: partial transfer (code 23) at main.c(578)
_exit_cleanup(code=0, file=main.c, line=578): about to call exit(23)
It even seems that all files are copied.
RedHat 7.2 with home-compiled version of rsync 2.5.5.
Could anybody shed some light on this?
Tha
contains version number 2.5.4 and it should be 2.5.5
..
--
Eero
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
> "Sviatoslav" == Sviatoslav Sviridov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Sviatoslav> Michael Richardson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>
>>
>> I added the following code to log_exit():
>>
>> void log_exit(int code, const char *file,
the rsync-2.5.5 package are a year old and do not
recognize VOS (the current ones do recognize us).
These patches change some Unix types to POSIX types (u_char ->
uchar_t), hide various unused declarations on systems that don't
implement IPv6, supply a network constants if the system doesn&
lace.
I think, it's better to avoid recoursive calling of exit_cleanup(), here is
main problem.
--
Sviatoslav Sviridov
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] [ICQ#10845380] [Lintec Project] [MLUG]
--
Beware the one behind you.
rsync-2.5.5-alt-cleanup.patch
Description: Binary data
ymlinks, batchfiles,
IPv6, 32-bit system inums, 64-bit internal inums
rsync comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. This is free software, and you
are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions. See the GNU
General Public Licence for details.
freeswan@xs1:~$ gdb src/rsync-2.5.5/r
I noticed this behavior earlier. Thanks for the patch.
eric
Ruediger Oertel wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> we ran into a little problem with rsync-2.5.5.
>
> Setup: you run rsync-2.5.5 as normal rsync over ssh
> (ie. not connecting to a rsync server). If you start
> such a
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 10:03:33 +0200 (CEST)
Ruediger Oertel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we ran into a little problem with rsync-2.5.5.
>
> Setup: you run rsync-2.5.5 as normal rsync over ssh
> (ie. not connecting to a rsync server). If you start
> such a rsyn
Hi,
we ran into a little problem with rsync-2.5.5.
Setup: you run rsync-2.5.5 as normal rsync over ssh
(ie. not connecting to a rsync server). If you start
such a rsync but interrupt the pulling process with Ctrl-C,
the process on the other side may start to allocate all
memory on the remote
ble via SameTime Connect within Philips, caesupport2 on AIM
"There are some who call me Tim?"
Erik Enge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
10/01/2002 02:10 PM
To: Tim Conway/LMT/SC/PHILIPS@AMEC
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Did you have a look at the core file? Building unstripped rsycn and then
debug the core should give you some ideas. The large number you are
getting may be caused by memory corruption.
> Usually it's pretty obvious which environment variable is the problem.
I think that you really mean process
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Erik: One more thing to try: redirect in /dev/null to the rsync
> command. At one time, at least, its behaviour was different based on
> the nature of its STDIN. Make sure STDERR and STDIN are redirected
> somewhere, too... either a file or null.
All our output are r
PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
10/01/2002 12:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Tim Conway/LMT/SC/PHILIPS)
Subject:Re: rsync 2.5.5 segmentation fault on Linux x86.
Classification:
Paul Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> T
Paul Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Then I run it once interactively and once through cron and compare stuff.
>
> Usually it's pretty obvious which environment variable is the problem.
I also noticed in the logs that rsync exists with "exit code 12":
Oct 1 01:31:59 backup-server inetd[1
Paul Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This isn't specific to rsync.
I must be missing something. The fact that rsync segfaults isn't
specific to rsync?
We run tens of thousands of cronjobs a week and none of them have so far
segfaulted.
However, since I can't make it segfault on the comma
ly lost where to start debugging this problem, has anybody else
> seen this before and would be able to give me a hint?
>
> It's rsync 2.5.5 compiled from source with gcc 2.96 on RedHat Linux 7.2.
>
> Thanks for any pointers,
>
> Erik Enge.
> --
> To uns
ne 28: 18453 Segmentation fault
rsync -acx --delete ${_backup_dirs} backup-server::backup-client
>
>If I run rsync from the command-line everything works as expected and no
>segmentation fault.
>
>I'm really lost where to start debugging this problem, has anybody else
>seen this bef
${_backup_dirs} backup-server::backup-client
If I run rsync from the command-line everything works as expected and no
segmentation fault.
I'm really lost where to start debugging this problem, has anybody else
seen this before and would be able to give me a hint?
It's rsync 2.5.5 com
Hello,
I tried to copy files >2GB locally with rsync 2.5.5 on HP-UX but I always
get the following error message:
rsync: error writing 32768 unbuffered bytes - exiting: Broken pipe
rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at
io.c(463)
I know that this i
t, CO 80501
Available via SameTime Connect within Philips, caesupport2 on AIM
"There are some who call me Tim?"
Robert Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
09/18/2002 10:07 AM
To: Tim Conway/LMT/SC/PHILIPS@AMEC
cc:
Subject:rsync-2.5.5 hangs in
I have found an unwanted feature of rsync 2.5.5. It has to do with
soft links and the --delete option in archive mode. The following shows
how to reproduce the error.
Provide a soft link that refers to a parent directory.
%> /bin/ls -lR /tmp/src
/tmp/src:
total 16
16 drwxrwxr-x 2
Hi, (AGAIN...)
At Rs6000/AIX-4.3.3 the rsync-2.5.5
(compiled with --disable-ipv6 and --disable-debug) works ok
when make local connections or I use -e rsh or -e ssh
for remote connections, like:
(OK) ./rsync -vacz . /user
(OK) ./rsync -vacz -e rsh . [EMAIL PROTECTED]:user
(OK) ./rsync
the rsync-2.5.5 package are a year old and do not
recognize VOS (the current ones do recognize us).
These patches change some Unix types to POSIX types (u_char ->
uchar_t), hide various unused declarations on systems that don't
implement IPv6, supply a network constants if the system doesn&
Alvaro Gomes Sobral Barcellos wrote:
>
> Hi,
> At Rs6000/AIX-4.3.3 the rsync-2.5.5 works ok when make local
> connections or I use -e rsh or -e ssh for remote connections, like:
>
> (OK) ./rsync -vacz . /user
> (OK) ./rsync -vacz -e rsh . [EMAIL PROTECTED]:user
&g
(bcc: Tim Conway/LMT/SC/PHILIPS)
Subject: AIX 4.3.3. e rsync 2.5.5
Classification:
Hi,
At Rs6000/AIX-4.3.3 the rsync-2.5.5 works ok when make
local
connections or I use -e rsh or -e ssh for remote connections, like:
(OK) ./rsync -vacz . /user
(OK) ./rsync -vacz
Hi,
At Rs6000/AIX-4.3.3 the rsync-2.5.5 works ok when make local
connections or I use -e rsh or -e ssh for remote connections, like:
(OK) ./rsync -vacz . /user
(OK) ./rsync -vacz -e rsh . [EMAIL PROTECTED]:user
(OK) ./rsync -vacz -e ssh . [EMAIL PROTECTED]:user
but with standart
I've determined what seems to be a work-around for this unexplained error.
I'm not a programmer, so I don't know for sure why it works, but adding a
call to msleep() for 200 ms in the following sections of main.c "fixes"
things. Hopefully, someone with more knowledge of this program can tell me
w
I've seen this error on HP-UX systems as well. I spent a couple hours picking through
the source trying to track it down, but so far no luck.
What I have discovered:
+ It's still broken as of last night's CVS version
+ It only seems to happen when sending files from an HP-UX system (receivi
Thanks in advance for taking the time to read this email.
I'm using rsync to make a copy of my Netbackup Catalogs
to an offsite server for DRP. I have narrowed the problem
down to a few sub-directories that contains 16 directories
each and in each directory there are about 37 files. None
of the
I'm observing a rather strange behaviour when attempting to transfer files from
a Linux box (RH 7.3, kernel 2.4.19-rc1) to HP-UX 11.11 box. Both are running
rsync 2.5.5.
Everything starts off really nice an quick, but the transfer then slows down to
a crawl. On 100 Mb/s network I'm get
Dear friends!
I really appriciate the great job you did on rsync package and hope for its
further improvement and development. It works great in our pretty complex
environment and helps us a lot in our daily duties.
But we've run into couple of small inconveniences.
First one:
We use rsyncd to
>-Original Message-
>From: Zoong Pham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Sunday, July 14, 2002 8:27 PM
>To: Dang, Tan
>Cc: 'David Starks-Browning '; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
>Subject: Re: rsync 2.5.5 Tru64 5.1
>
>
>On Sat, Jul 13, 2002 at 04
X" is not
> declared. (undeclared)
Check this in your source tree: rsync-2.5.5/patches/rsync_zoong_tru64.diff
Hope it helps.
--
Zoong Pham
UNIX Systems Administrator
PGP public key is available on request
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/m
ver V6.4-013 (dtk) cc Driver
Tan
-Original Message-
From: David Starks-Browning
To: Dang, Tan; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Sent: 7/13/02 4:45 AM
Subject: rsync 2.5.5 Tru64 5.1
On Saturday 13 Jul 02, David Starks-Browning writes:
> I'm tempted not to respond just because you do such a
On Saturday 13 Jul 02, David Starks-Browning writes:
> I'm tempted not to respond just because you do such a poor job of
> problem reporting. What version of Tru64?
Oh, I see that's already in the Subject line. Sorry.
> What, exactly, were the errors?
(Still the most important missing detai
On Friday 12 Jul 02, Dang, Tan writes:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to compile rsync 2.5.5 on a Tru64 box. I downloaded
> configure.in revision 1.148, which I believe is the correct fix for the
> getaddrinfo problem; however I still have errors compiling rsync. Also I
> had to
On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 01:03:33PM -0500, Dang, Tan wrote:
> Also I had to change line 22 in options.c from #include "popt.h" to #include
> "popt/popt.h". Any suggestions or ideas?
Doesn't CFLAGS in the generated Makefile contain ``-I./popt''?
--
Jos Backus _/ _/_/_/Sa
Hi,
I am trying to compile rsync 2.5.5 on a Tru64 box. I downloaded
configure.in revision 1.148, which I believe is the correct fix for the
getaddrinfo problem; however I still have errors compiling rsync. Also I
had to change line 22 in options.c from #include "popt.h" to #inc
Hi,
it seems rsync's configure complains about sys/mode.h.
here's the relevant part from config.log. Any idea what should I do now
with it?
Thanks!
configure:4360: checking sys/mode.h usability
configure:4369: cc -c -O3 -n32 -TARG:platform=IP22 -I/usr/local/include
-I/software/@sys/usr/inclu
Hi there,
I've a problem with rsync - see below.
(by the way: I'm using rsync since 2 years now, good work!)
my environment:
- linux, 2.4, Dual-PIII-1.2GHz, 1 GB RAM. more of these machines.
- rsync 2.5.5
- openssh 3.3
the machines are on a lan, so bandwith is not a problem.
I
're running it from a
> > remoteserver... If there's a way to trick the system into thinking
> > that the
> > rsync daemon is running as root on the local machine, that would
> > be ideal.
> > Unfortunately, I don't know enough about the UNIX side of thin
know enough about the UNIX side of things
> to get
> that far.
> -Tito
>
> > Message: 5
> > Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 10:08:00 -0600
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: rsync 2.5.5 and Mac OS X
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTEC
Greetings,
Has anyone successfully compiled rsync 2.5.5 under Mac OS X (not
Server), and actually have it work fully?
I'm in a position where I'm trying to setup an automated nightly remote
backup between and Cobalt Raq4 (running a variant of Redhat Linux) and a
Mac running OS X 10.1.
The following patch (adapted to rsync 2.5.5 from the one posted in
Dec. 2000, http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/rsync/2000-December/003349.html)
is necessary to prevent rsync from failing on creating FIFOs or UNIX
sockets on FreeBSD. Any chance for it to be integrated in a future
release of rsync
Since the process didn't exit, it must still be in the process table.
When you get to this state have your process do something like:
fprintf(stderr, "The weird process is pid %d\n",pid);
fflush(stderr);
sleep(1000);
Then see what ps says about that process. If that doesn't offer any
hint
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 11:53:34AM -0400, Paul Haas wrote:
> On Wed, 29 May 2002, Allen D. Winter wrote:
>
Much stuff snipped..
> The EINTR case doesn't make sense with WNOHANG, but HP-UX doesn't always
> do things that make sense. If you get the "Now what should I do?"
> message, then add cod
On Wed, 29 May 2002, Allen D. Winter wrote:
> I finally found that in the wait_process() function in main.c, the status
> value returned from WEXITSTATUS() was apparently returning
> the pid of the child instead of the exit status of the child... or something
> like that.
Or something not like t
I've been through the archive and found nothing definitive on this.
However, I am definitely seeing rsync hanging. I'm rsyncing from a
Solaris 2.8 box running rsync 2.5.5 protocol version 26 and SSH version
2.1.0 (non-commercial version) to a Linux RedHat box running rsync 2.5.
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 05:47:10PM -0400, Allen D. Winter wrote:
> Once upon a time I threw printfs all over the source looking to track down
> the cause of this problem. Seemingly a random error code is generated
> each time rsync is run *succesfully* on HPUX.
>
> I finally found that in the wa
WEXITSTATUS() was apparently returning
the pid of the child instead of the exit status of the child... or something
like that.
I've learned to ignore the error codes and live with it.
Love to see this fixed.
On Wednesday 29 May 2002 01:24 pm, Charles F. Fisher wrote:
> I compiled rsync-2.5.5 on HP
I compiled rsync-2.5.5 on HPUX 11.11, using the +DA2.0W and +O3 options.
invoking a simple rsync to transfer a file works (I ran a diff on the file,
no changes) e.g:
sdx1 214: ./rsync --rsh='/usr/bin/ssh -x'
--rsync-path=/usr/local/src/rsync-2.5.5/rsync /scratch/chuck/tmp.test
sdx
]>
> To: Kevin Alexander Boyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: rsync 2.5.5 w/ HFS+ support for OS X
>
> This is great! Is it possible for this to work in such a way that HSF+
> information can be preserved when syncing to a non HFS+ system if a special
>
> Hello,
>
> I think i may have found a bug in the "max clients" option in rsyncd.conf
> [we use rsync-2.5.5; All platforms I tried (Irix-6.5.14 and various linux
> flavours) show the behaviour explained below]
>
> The manpage says:
>
> |max connections
>
970),
".\n" '
"There are some who call me Tim?"
Dick Snippe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
05/16/2002 05:46 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Tim Conway/LMT/SC/PHILIPS)
Subject:possible bug rsync-2.5.
Hello,
I think i may have found a bug in the "max clients" option in rsyncd.conf
[we use rsync-2.5.5; All platforms I tried (Irix-6.5.14 and various linux
flavours) show the behaviour explained below]
The manpage says:
|max connections
| The "max connections" option a
> -Original Message-
> The error message says that the server shell couldn't find a command
> named "rsync". Check the bash startup scripts to make sure that they
> run without error and that PATH is set correctly. You said you
> recompiled rsync. Is the directory wh
> -Original Message-
> From: jw schultz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, 14 May 2002 12:48 PM
> To: Matt Gavin
> Subject: Re: Help please... rsync 2.5.5 on Solaris 2.7
>
> Sounds like PATH to me. Can you "remsh syndey rsync --version"?
>
&g
> -Original Message-
> From: jw schultz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, 14 May 2002 12:48 PM
> To: Matt Gavin
> Subject: Re: Help please... rsync 2.5.5 on Solaris 2.7
>
> Sounds like PATH to me. Can you "remsh syndey rsync --version"?
>
&g
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> Behalf Of Michael Fischer
> Sent: Tuesday, 14 May 2002 12:47 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Matt Gavin
> Subject: Re: Help please... rsync 2.5.5 on Solaris 2.7
>
1 - 100 of 143 matches
Mail list logo
