On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 02:58:43PM +0100, Paul Slootman wrote:
> On Wed 12 Mar 2003, jw schultz wrote:
> >
> > I've attached a patch that creates a uint64 for INO64_t and
> > DEV64_T and it fixes all the signed-unsigned comparison
> > warnings.
>
> Sure, but that went a bit too far for me at this
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 02:58:43PM +0100, Paul Slootman wrote:
> On Wed 12 Mar 2003, jw schultz wrote:
> >
> > I've attached a patch that creates a uint64 for INO64_t and
> > DEV64_T and it fixes all the signed-unsigned comparison
> > warnings.
>
> Sure, but that went a bit too far for me at this
On Wed 12 Mar 2003, jw schultz wrote:
>
> I've attached a patch that creates a uint64 for INO64_t and
> DEV64_T and it fixes all the signed-unsigned comparison
> warnings.
Sure, but that went a bit too far for me at this time.
Your patch looks fine.
> I've also attached a patch for Makefile.in s
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 01:34:58PM +0100, Paul Slootman wrote:
> Two patches:
> one to correct the spelling of permissions (in comments, but such typos
> disturb me as well), and
OK. I can't speel but but spelling errors impede clarity.
> one to cast inode and dev to unsigned long before compari
Two patches:
one to correct the spelling of permissions (in comments, but such typos
disturb me as well), and
one to cast inode and dev to unsigned long before comparing, to prevent
gcc giving a warning "comparison between signed and unsigned".
Paul Slootman
diff -ru orig/rsync-2.5.6/generator.c