On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 02:58:43PM +0100, Paul Slootman wrote:
> On Wed 12 Mar 2003, jw schultz wrote:
> >
> > I've attached a patch that creates a uint64 for INO64_t and
> > DEV64_T and it fixes all the signed-unsigned comparison
> > warnings.
>
> Sure, but that went a bit too far for me at this time.
> Your patch looks fine.
>
> > I've also attached a patch for Makefile.in so that header
> > changes will force rebuilds. This one is clearly for
> > maintainer convenience.
>
> Good one.
>
>
> Who will commit these to CVS? Will that happen automagically after
> posting here, of does someone need prodding? :-)
One of several possibilities exist. Another maintainer with
commit privs may check in what he approves, I'll get around
to getting commit privs and commit after i get a nod from
another maintainer (don't want rogue commits for functional
changes), or it will languish.
--
________________________________________________________________
J.W. Schultz Pegasystems Technologies
email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Remember Cernan and Schmitt
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
