https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4017
Wayne Davison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #11193||review-
Flags|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4017
--- Comment #2 from Alice ---
Created attachment 11193
--> https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=11193&action=edit
patch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
--
Please use reply-all for most replies
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 04:31:50PM +0530, Lakshminarayanan RadhaKrishnan wrote:
> There is no other message except the following in other side of the node.
>
> 2007/01/09 06:30:18 [734] rsyncd version 2.6.8 starting, listening on port 873
I'm talking about the other end of the transfer. You're
: Lakshminarayanan RadhaKrishnan
Cc: rsync@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: rsync - 2.6.8 ( broken pipe )
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 12:28:28PM +0530, Lakshminarayanan RadhaKrishnan
wrote:
> 2007/01/09 02:11:36 [1076] rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (342821
> bytes received so far) [receiver]
Wha
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 12:28:28PM +0530, Lakshminarayanan RadhaKrishnan wrote:
> 2007/01/09 02:11:36 [1076] rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (342821
> bytes received so far) [receiver]
What does the rsync on the other side report when this happens?
..wayne..
--
To unsubscribe or change opt
Wayne,
While testing rsync 2.6.8, I often receive broken pipe error, even though
there is no network problem, between
Active and Standby nodes. Please clarify.
2007/01/09 02:11:36 [1076] rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (342821
bytes received so far) [receiver]
2007/01/09 02:11
Hi.
I have an anonymous rsync server set up on cvs.blackfin.uclinux.org, which
allows people to take our entire cvs/snv respositories (which are _huge_)
and do local checkouts. It works really well for most people.
I have a client set up on a static IP numbers, off the backbone, which work
f
On 10/9/06, Lakshminarayanan Radhakrishan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
" 2006/09/21 02:04:31 [4513] rsync: writefd_unbuffered failed to write
4092 bytes [generator]: Broken pipe (32)
2006/09/21 02:04:31 [4513] rsync error: error in rsync protocol data
stream (code 12) at io.c(1119) [generator=2.6.
06/09/21 02:04:31 [4513] rsync error: error in rsync protocol data
stream (code 12) at io.c(1119) [generator=2.6.8] "
thanks & regards
Laks
Matt McCutchen wrote:
On 9/15/06, Lakshminarayanan Radhakrishan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have downloaded the latest rsync 2.6.8
error: error in rsync protocol data
stream (code 12) at io.c(1119) [generator=2.6.8]"
I am not getting tag-3 problem patch you mentioned in your mail.
Today also i downloaded the following latest rsync 2.6.8
packages from www.sunfreeware.com.
465783 Oct 4 15:20 libgcc-3.4.6-sol10-spar
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 02:13:01PM +0530, Lakshminarayanan Radhakrishan wrote:
> 2006/09/21 02:04:31 [4513] rsync: writefd_unbuffered failed to write
> 4092 bytes [generator]: Broken pipe (32)
As the Issues and Debugging webpage says, this error just indicates that
the remote side went away. Why
Wayne,
I have downloaded the latest Rsync software 2.6.8 and installed in my
testbeds.
I am gettting the following error some times in the console during the
file transfer.
Mate system is not rebooted and the link between the Active system and
Standby system also
not disturbed during the peri
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4017
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
On 9/15/06, Lakshminarayanan Radhakrishan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have downloaded the latest rsync 2.6.8 package
"rsync-2.6.8-sol8-sparc-local.gz" from solaris freeware website.
[...]
Any other package need to be downloaded for this ?
"Rsync requires that you instal
Hi ,
I have downloaded the latest rsync 2.6.8 package
"rsync-2.6.8-sol8-sparc-local.gz" from solaris freeware website.
After the installation of the package, i tried verify the list of
dynamic dependancies,
it is throwing the following problem.
Any other package need to be down
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4017
Summary: rsync 2.6.8: "unexpected tag 3 [sender]"
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.8
Platform: x64
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Pr
On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 18:19:53 -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
>> First of all, the patch places sysacls.[hc] one directory too high.
>> These need to be in the libs directory, lest 'make' will fail.
>
> This means that you didn't use a -p option to patch -- you should use
> either -p1 (modern patches)
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 06:49:11PM -0400, Andrew Gideon wrote:
> First of all, the patch places sysacls.[hc] one directory too high.
> These need to be in the libs directory, lest 'make' will fail.
This means that you didn't use a -p option to patch -- you should use
either -p1 (modern patches) or
On Tue, 02 May 2006 22:51:37 -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 10:58:01PM -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
>> At some point in the future, I will get back to improving the ACL
>> support.
>
> In the meantime, the patch in CVS has been improved significantly, and
> needs testing to
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 06:24:30PM +0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Can anyone tell me how to install rsync-2.6.8 in Red Hat 5.2 box ?
Download the 2.6.8 tar file and then build and install that. You could
do that using rpmbuild, as long as your rpm build environment is setup.
For insta
Can anyone tell me how to install rsync-2.6.8 in Red Hat 5.2 box ?
Thanx
Christopher Heyneker
Indonesia
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3768
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
Dominik Vogt wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 24, 2006 at 10:17:01AM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> Of course there is netstat, but my question was aiming for the
> command on AIX that can be used in place of Linux' strace.
Try 'truss' ('man 5 truss'). It's very likely to be present
on every modern Unix syste
On Sat, Jun 24, 2006 at 10:17:01AM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 03:26:40PM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > There is another machine in between that forwards all tcp
> > packets to the target machine:
>
> I haven't used socat before, but have successfully used nc (netcat), s
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 03:26:40PM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> There is another machine in between that forwards all tcp
> packets to the target machine:
I haven't used socat before, but have successfully used nc (netcat), so
you might try switching over to that to see if the problem is socat. I
We're copying a large number of 256MiB-files from one
AIX-5.3 machine to anoter, using rsync-2.6.8 (with ssh). In
the morning, the rsync process stopped to copy any more files
(it is still hanging as I write this, and we can leave it alone for
a couple of days).
There is another machi
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 04:47:01PM -0500, Bill Gunter wrote:
> --include='wwwroot/*' --include='perl/*'
> --exclude='*'
The patterns 'wwwroot/*' and 'perl/*' only match items one level below
the matching directory, but no lower (unless they're matched by an
earlier rule, such as directories
I'm using a somewhat complicated --include/exclude chain to copy all
files matching a pattern, plus all files in certain subdirs.
/usr/local/bin/rsync -a
--include='*/' --include='*.[wip]'
--include='*.htm' --include='*.html' --include='*.off'
--include='wwwroot/*' --include='perl/*'
--
On Wednesday, 24. May 2006, 09:07, Wayne Davison (as WD) wrote:
>WD: On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 07:56:54AM +0200, Andreas Fehr wrote:
>WD: > I'm back with my -cav and rsync does not copy files, even if I've
>WD: > touched them.
/opt/rsync/bin/rsync -cav
--link-dest=/home/user/backup/old
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 07:56:54AM +0200, Andreas Fehr wrote:
> I'm back with my -cav and rsync does not copy files, even if I've
> touched them.
Are you copying into an already populated destination directory? It
sounds like it. When --link-dest is used to create a new hierarchy,
rsync will on
On Tuesday, 23. May 2006, 18:04, Andreas Fehr (as AF) wrote:
>AF: >WD: > Well, I changed '-a' to '-rlpgoD' (according to the man
>AF: >WD: > page, it maps to '-rlptgoD'). But now it's worse each
>AF: >WD: > call of rsync copies all the files from source to new.
>AF: >WD:
>AF: >WD: As Matt m
On Tuesday, 23. May 2006, 08:52, Wayne Davison (as WD) wrote:
>WD: On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 11:40:48AM +0200, Andreas Fehr wrote:
>WD: > Well, I changed '-a' to '-rlpgoD' (according to the man page, it
>WD: > maps to '-rlptgoD'). But now it's worse each call of rsync
>WD: > copies all the fil
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 11:40:48AM +0200, Andreas Fehr wrote:
> Well, I changed '-a' to '-rlpgoD' (according to the man page, it maps
> to '-rlptgoD'). But now it's worse each call of rsync copies all
> the files from source to new.
As Matt mentioned, this was fixed recently in CVS. The fix c
On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 11:40 +0200, Andreas Fehr wrote:
> Well, I changed '-a' to '-rlpgoD' (according to the man page, it maps to
> '-rlptgoD'). But now it's worse each call of rsync copies all the
> files from source to new.
>
> /opt/rsync/bin/rsync -crlpgoDv
> --link-dest=/home/user/backup
On Tuesday, 23. May 2006, 11:07, Paul Slootman (as PS) wrote:
>PS: On Mon 22 May 2006, Andreas Fehr wrote:
>PS: >
>PS: > If added '-c' to the already existing '-a'. Now it looks as follows:
>PS: >
>PS: > /opt/rsync/bin/rsync -cav
>PS: > --link-dest=/home/user/backup/old
>PS: > /home/
On Mon 22 May 2006, Andreas Fehr wrote:
>
> If added '-c' to the already existing '-a'. Now it looks as follows:
>
> /opt/rsync/bin/rsync -cav
> --link-dest=/home/user/backup/old
> /home/user/source
> /home/user/backup/new
>
>
> I expected, that rsync doesn't care about
Hi
I have a problem with rsync and the -c option. I think understand what
it does, but I'm not sure, it does it correctly. But then I guess,
perhaps I don't understand what it does... :-)
I use "rsync version 2.6.8 protocol version 29"
I use the following command:
/opt/rsync/bin/rsync -a
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3768
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-10 09:58 MST ---
The only time that rsync sends the --no-specials option is when the user has
requested only the transfer of devices and not special files. This undoubtedly
means that the op
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3768
Summary: --no-specials in Rsync 2.6.8 breaks compatibility with
2.6.0-r6 Mirroring system
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.8
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 10:58:01PM -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> At some point in the future, I will get back to improving the ACL
> support.
In the meantime, the patch in CVS has been improved significantly, and
needs testing to ensure that it works well. For instance, I got rid of
some really
On Mon, 1 May 2006, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> I have finally made packages for rsync 2.6.8 with ACL support. You can
> download a prepatched source package and RPMs from here:
> http://www.kepreon.com/~matt/myrsync/
>
> Or you can use this yum repository:
> http
Dear rsync people,
I have finally made packages for rsync 2.6.8 with ACL support. You can
download a prepatched source package and RPMs from here:
http://www.kepreon.com/~matt/myrsync/
Or you can use this yum repository:
http://www.kepreon.com/~matt/rpm/
The RPM is called rsync
://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/NEWS
The tar file of the source and its signature are here:
http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/rsync-2.6.8.tar.gz
http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/rsync-2.6.8.tar.gz.asc
See the web site for other download possibilities (including unified
diffs based on the previous
43 matches
Mail list logo
