That's probably because you didn't run ./prepare_source.
However, you
don't want to be running the CVS version for anything other than helping
with development at the moment. We're very early in the development of
3.0.0, and there's a lot of stuff that will be changing in the new
protocol 30 in t
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 11:15:34AM -0800, snowcrash wrote:
> rsync.c:106: error: conflicting types for 'dest_mode'
That's probably because you didn't run ./prepare_source. However, you
don't want to be running the CVS version for anything other than helping
with development at the moment.
hi,
the 'osx magic', per your suggestion, was apparently to:
patch -p1 https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
First, to be clear, you are building rsync on Mac OS X, right?
You need at least Tiger.
absolutely. i've an up-to-date osx 10.4.8 install, w/ latest XTools
etc from Apple.
Don't enable acl support on osx. It doesn't work. You probably don't
have ACLs on your files anyways as it has to be enab
On Nov 25, 2006, at 4:41 PM, snowcrash+rsync wrote:
> will these dependencies be resolved -- either by bundling req'd
> headers with the distro, or by finding/using osx equivalents?
What dependencies? The acl and xattr headers are simply part of a
normal osx install with developer tools. No fink
> will these dependencies be resolved -- either by bundling req'd
> headers with the distro, or by finding/using osx equivalents?
What dependencies? The acl and xattr headers are simply part of a
normal osx install with developer tools. No fink/etc needed.
really? then, perhaps, i'm misundersta
On Nov 23, 2006, at 6:27 PM, snowcrash+rsync wrote:
(1) i note that the 'new' xattr/acl support applies to osx as well.
is this intended to replace apple's patched support?
(2) at least on v2.6.9-release, the build w/ xattr/acl patches applied
seems to require a number of header files from non-o
On Nov 25, 2006, at 4:11 AM, Wayne Davison wrote:
will these dependencies be resolved -- either by bundling req'd
headers with the distro, or by finding/using osx equivalents?
The main release should stick fairly close to the posix functions,
and will not have any extra libraries bundled in. I
wayne,
thanks for the explanation.
i've noticed no mention of the new rsync work (xattr/acl) on appple's
boards ... probably not surprising as the current release is rsync
v2.6.3 + *their* patches, and they're notoriously tight-lipped about
unreleased products.
anyway, i've got a mostly-working
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 09:27:59AM -0800, snowcrash+rsync wrote:
> (1) i note that the 'new' xattr/acl support applies to osx as well.
> is this intended to replace apple's patched support?
Eventually. The xattr patch still needs work to finish it up, but
when it finally makes it into the main rs
and the 'lartmaker' fix (iteself, slightly fixed ...):
applied.
What exactly did you have to fix ?
after applying,
http://www.opensource.apple.com/darwinsource/10.4.8.ppc/rsync-24/patches/EA.diff
http://www.opensource.apple.com/darwinsource/10.4.8.ppc/rsync-24/patches/PR-
11 matches
Mail list logo
