On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 10:36:18AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In other words, I can't wait until the first run has completed the
> large copy to begin copying additional files. I want to start a
> second, third, fourth, etc copy that begins working on any additional
> files that may have be
On Mon, 2008-08-18 at 10:36 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have an identical set of directories at two locations. When a file
> is added to one location, I'll call it the source side, I want to run
> a script that picks up that file and copies it to the other location,
> say the destination s
Another Kyle wrote:
> However, I want to schedule the script to run, say every 15 minutes.
> That way if a file is put on the source side, the cript will pick it up
> and begin copying it. However, if the file is a few hundred MB, it might
> take longer than 15 minutes to copy it.
>
> In other w
On Mon 18 Aug 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >> The way I solved this problem for a data-mirroring system was to use a
> >> small wrapper script that ensures only one invocation of rsync is ever
> >> running at one time. This proved to be a robust solution for our situation.
>
> >> --Kyle
>
A different Kyle wrote:
> I have a situation that requires the files that rsync is
> uploading/downloading to be locked. The reason is because it is possible
> to have more than one copy of rsync running and without file locking,
> the additional copies simply retry to upload/download a file that
On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 13:51 -0500, Andrew Culver wrote:
> I have two web servers both mounting the same file system (with GFS). I
> have a third web server which is independent from the first two, using
> only its own local file systems. I need to mirror a directory within the
> shared file syst
> -Original Message-
> From: Stuart Halliday [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 05 September 2006 15:25
> To: rsync@lists.samba.org
> Subject: Re: File Locking under Windows - a solution ?
>
> > Does anyone know of a way this locking can be overridden ? - is i
What about using some staging logic if you have enough disk space and can
introduce the logic required into your system :
1. Keep two copies of your files on your live servers: FEED-A and FEED-B
2. Initialization
a. rsync FEED-A and FEED-B with the preview server content
b. Select FEED-A
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 06 September 2006 05:03
> To: Michael Pickard
> Cc: rsync@lists.samba.org
> Subject: RE: File Locking under Windows - a solution ?
>
> Try to access the lock file using "Windows s
Hello,
We are currently using Rsync (with cygwin) to propagate static files
from a preview server (Windows) to our live servers (Windows) on demand.
Unfortunately, because the live servers are *live*, inevitably some of
the files we mean to update are in use and therefore locked by the
windows
> Does anyone know of a way this locking can be overridden ? - is it
> possible to 'force' updates ? it is important that all live servers
> have identical filesystems.
I doubt it.
Windows Filing system doesn't work that way.
You can buy open file managers. But these are designed to allow a file
11 matches
Mail list logo
