On Mon 18 Aug 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >> The way I solved this problem for a data-mirroring system was to use a > >> small wrapper script that ensures only one invocation of rsync is ever > >> running at one time. This proved to be a robust solution for our situation. > > >> --Kyle > > Thanks for the idea but I sometimes need more than one copy to run at the > same time so that won't work. File locking is about the only option I can > see.
If you need to run more than one rsync over the same tree at the same time, you may need to rethink your tree layout and/or your approach to whatever problem you're trying to fix. Running two rsyncs sequentially will usually be faster than two concurrent ones, as that might cause disk thrashing (the heads are continually seeking to and from where the respective rsync processes are working). Paul Slootman -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
