On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 02:16:47PM -0600, Vernon A. Fort wrote:
> I am simply running the rsync command with nothing else, rsync and press
> enter. The only reason I am asking is I saw there was a much newer version
> then I am currently using (2.4.6) and thought about upgrading. Once I
> compil
-Original Message-
From: Dave Dykstra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 10:25 AM
To: Vernon A. Fort
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Rsync-2.5.2
On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 10:50:54PM -0600, Vernon A. Fort wrote:
> New to the group!
>
> Which version is c
On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 10:50:54PM -0600, Vernon A. Fort wrote:
> New to the group!
>
> Which version is considered stable for redhat 7.2. I have attempted to
> compile 2.5.2 but recieve numerous compile warning. Once installed, I
> receive the following error but just keying rsync {return}.
D
On 7 Feb 2002, Dave Dykstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I see a lot of messages have RSYNC_NAME ":" put on the beginning, including
> FINFO messages. I really don't think they belong on FINFO messages at
> all. I looked into it because I noticed it printing a symlink prefaced by
> "rsync:" whi
On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 11:23:34AM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
> On 30 Jan 2002, Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Dave Dykstra wrote:
> > > Martin has put in the below feature in rsync 2.5.2 for using a shell. I've
> > > already had one user complain about it. I th
I guess the argument about not breaking scripts also applies to
Wayne's otherwise good suggestion of showing file sizes in -v output.
--
Martin
On 30 Jan 2002, Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Dave Dykstra wrote:
> > Martin has put in the below feature in rsync 2.5.2 for using a shell. I've
> > already had one user complain about it. I think it would be better at the
> > -vv level.
>
> Yes, I agree that -
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Steve G wrote:
> I don't know if this amounts to much, but did you intend to use a &
> rather than a && at line 739 of flist.c?
Fortunately both items in the "&" expression can only have the value of
1 or 0, so the effect is the same as "&&". It looks like a typo to me,
thoug
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Dave Dykstra wrote:
> Martin has put in the below feature in rsync 2.5.2 for using a shell. I've
> already had one user complain about it. I think it would be better at the
> -vv level.
Yes, I agree that -vv would be better. People use -v primarily to see
what files are ge
