Re: [Bug 5124] Parallelize the rsync run using multiple threads and/or connections

2023-04-17 Thread Harry Mangalam via rsync
Obviously self-promotional, but Parsyncfp? https://github.com/hjmangalam/parsyncfp There are other like scripted parallel rsyncs, but I like this one. ;) Hjm On Mon, Apr 17, 2023, 3:42 AM just subscribed for rsync-qa from bugzilla via rsync wrote: > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?i

RE: [Bug 5124] Parallelize the rsync run using multiple threads and/or connections

2019-02-07 Thread Marc Roos via rsync
I made a bash script doing this in parallel, checks how many rsyncs are running and then starts another 'concurrent one'. My parallel sessions are against different servers. I doubt if it would make any sense doing multiple sessions between the same two hosts. My single rsync sessions was alre

Re: [Bug 5124] Parallelize the rsync run using multiple threads and/or connections

2014-02-10 Thread Jason Haar
On 26/01/14 18:03, L.A. Walsh wrote: > But multiple TCP connections are not used to load a single picture. > They are used > for separate items on the page. A single TCP stream CAN be very fast > and rsync > isn't close to hitting that limit. > The proof? Using 1Gb connections, smb/cifs could g

Re: [Bug 5124] Parallelize the rsync run using multiple threads and/or connections

2014-01-28 Thread Matthias Schniedermeyer
On 28.01.2014 04:26, L.A. Walsh wrote: > > > Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote: > >On 25.01.2014 21:03, L.A. Walsh wrote: > >>If rsync already hitting over 200MB (even over 100MB)/s I'd agree that using > >>multiple TCP connections would help as they could be processed by different > >>cpu's on both

Re: [Bug 5124] Parallelize the rsync run using multiple threads and/or connections

2014-01-28 Thread L.A. Walsh
Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote: On 25.01.2014 21:03, L.A. Walsh wrote: If rsync already hitting over 200MB (even over 100MB)/s I'd agree that using multiple TCP connections would help as they could be processed by different cpu's on both ends. But since it doesn't even hit 100MB/s locally, the

Re: [Bug 5124] Parallelize the rsync run using multiple threads and/or connections

2014-01-26 Thread Matthias Schniedermeyer
On 25.01.2014 21:03, L.A. Walsh wrote: > > If rsync already hitting over 200MB (even over 100MB)/s I'd agree that using > multiple TCP connections would help as they could be processed by different > cpu's on both ends. But since it doesn't even hit 100MB/s locally, the > limit *isn't* TCP connec

Re: [Bug 5124] Parallelize the rsync run using multiple threads and/or connections

2014-01-25 Thread L.A. Walsh
samba-b...@samba.org wrote: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5124 --- Comment #5 from Andrew J. Kroll 2014-01-19 03:10:35 UTC --- Another proven case is your typical modern web browser. There is a very good reason why multiple connections are used to load in those pretty pictures you