On 25.01.2014 21:03, L.A. Walsh wrote: > > If rsync already hitting over 200MB (even over 100MB)/s I'd agree that using > multiple TCP connections would help as they could be processed by different > cpu's on both ends. But since it doesn't even hit 100MB/s locally, the > limit *isn't* TCP connections.
Just FYI. Rsync 3.1 got much better in that regard. When i rsync a file locally from tmpfs to tmpfs rsync does that with about 560MB/s. Rsync 3.0.X managed to do less than half of that. -- Matthias -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
