[Bug 12440] make "rsync -N" == "rsync --numeric-ids" ?

2016-11-23 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12440 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Status|REOPENED

[Bug 12440] make "rsync -N" == "rsync --numeric-ids" ?

2016-11-23 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12440 Harri changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|WONTFIX

[Bug 12440] make "rsync -N" == "rsync --numeric-ids" ?

2016-11-23 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12440 --- Comment #3 from Harri --- I have several objections: * --numeric-ids is in wide use, while there is no --crtimes in rsync yet * --crtimes is useful only on MacOS, --numeric-ids on all Unix-like platforms. The probality for someone using

[Bug 12440] make "rsync -N" == "rsync --numeric-ids" ?

2016-11-23 Thread samba-bugs
rsync alias -N --numeric-ids rsync alias -9 -ai --numeric-ids --chmod=o-rwx --omit-link-times As long as you allocate your hosts with a consistent /etc/popt file, you can treat the option the same as if it were compiled into the executable. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Co

[Bug 12440] make "rsync -N" == "rsync --numeric-ids" ?

2016-11-23 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12440 --- Comment #1 from Harri --- Created attachment 12689 --> https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=12689&action=edit proposed patch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. -- Please use reply-all for m

[Bug 12440] New: make "rsync -N" == "rsync --numeric-ids" ?

2016-11-23 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12440 Bug ID: 12440 Summary: make "rsync -N" == "rsync --numeric-ids" ? Product: rsync Version: 3.1.2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW S

Re: make "rsync -N" == "rsync --numeric-ids" ?

2016-11-23 Thread Harald Dunkel
On 11/18/2016 10:49 AM, Paul Slootman wrote: > On Fri 18 Nov 2016, Harald Dunkel wrote: >> >> "--numeric-ids" is a lot of text and easy to be forgotten or >> misspelled. >> >> Since it is a highly important option for making backups of >> r

Re: make "rsync -N" == "rsync --numeric-ids" ?

2016-11-18 Thread Paul Slootman
On Fri 18 Nov 2016, Harald Dunkel wrote: > > "--numeric-ids" is a lot of text and easy to be forgotten or > misspelled. > > Since it is a highly important option for making backups of > remote systems via rsync I wonder if "-N" could be introduced > as

make "rsync -N" == "rsync --numeric-ids" ?

2016-11-18 Thread Harald Dunkel
Hi folks, "--numeric-ids" is a lot of text and easy to be forgotten or misspelled. Since it is a highly important option for making backups of remote systems via rsync I wonder if "-N" could be introduced as an abbreviation for "--numeric-ids"? "-N" is no

[Bug 12196] New: --numeric-ids broke usermap and groupmap in acls

2016-08-31 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12196 Bug ID: 12196 Summary: --numeric-ids broke usermap and groupmap in acls Product: rsync Version: 3.1.2 Hardware: x64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal

Re: OS X and rsync: unpack_smb_acl errors and --numeric-ids

2016-04-06 Thread Henri Shustak
> Submitted as bug: > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10649 This bug has been stale for a while. In order to dive in and have a go at working out what is wrong and how to fix it ; is signing up with the samba bug tracker required? Probably will not have time to look at it immediately

Re: OS X and rsync: unpack_smb_acl errors and --numeric-ids

2014-06-05 Thread Kyle Crawford
happens, the UUID of the group is > >>>>> displayed instead of the user or group in an ls -le for > >>>>> example: > >>>>> > >>>>> host:~$ ls -le > >>>>> > /Volumes/Src/81-access-control-list

[Bug 10649] New: --acls does not honor --numeric-ids on OS X

2014-06-05 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10649 Summary: --acls does not honor --numeric-ids on OS X Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5

Re: OS X and rsync: unpack_smb_acl errors and --numeric-ids

2014-06-03 Thread Kyle Crawford
roup in an ls -le for >>>>> example: >>>>> >>>>> host:~$ ls -le >>>>> /Volumes/Src/81-access-control-lists-missing-user-and-group/acl-test-2 >> > - -rw-r--r--+ 1 root wheel 0 May 30 13:01 >>>>> /Volumes/Src/81-a

Re: OS X and rsync: unpack_smb_acl errors and --numeric-ids

2014-05-30 Thread Kevin Korb
/81-access-control-lists-missing-user-and-group/acl-test-2 > >>>> - -rw-r--r--+ 1 root wheel 0 May 30 13:01 >>>> /Volumes/Src/81-access-control-lists-missing-user-and-group/acl-test-2 > >>>> 0: 4D429A34-54A4-48F2-A9AB-9D1E7D1E6738 allow read >>&

Re: OS X and rsync: unpack_smb_acl errors and --numeric-ids

2014-05-30 Thread Kyle Crawford
D1E7D1E6738 allow read >> 1: 1E0D050D-973C-47C4-8ACE-D900B04B986D allow read >> >> Or you can see the UUID using ls -len (numeric). >> >> So when I am transferring from OS X to OS X, I'd like these UUIDs >> to just get transferred as UUIDs the same way t

Re: OS X and rsync: unpack_smb_acl errors and --numeric-ids

2014-05-30 Thread Kevin Korb
1: 1E0D050D-973C-47C4-8ACE-D900B04B986D allow read > > Or you can see the UUID using ls -len (numeric). > > So when I am transferring from OS X to OS X, I'd like these UUIDs > to just get transferred as UUIDs the same way that --numeric-ids > works. > > That way I can g

OS X and rsync: unpack_smb_acl errors and --numeric-ids

2014-05-30 Thread Kyle Crawford
meric). So when I am transferring from OS X to OS X, I'd like these UUIDs to just get transferred as UUIDs the same way that --numeric-ids works. That way I can get a nice exit status of 0 and have confidence in my backups. Mr. Bombich has worked around this issue and even posted a patch ba

[Bug 8020] --acls does not honor --numeric-ids if UIDs do not match

2011-03-21 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8020 --- Comment #8 from Curu Wong 2011-03-21 13:19:10 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > Created attachment 6334 [details] > Don't send names for ACL IDs w/--numeric-ids option > > Instead of ignoring the names, the sender should not

[Bug 8020] --acls does not honor --numeric-ids if UIDs do not match

2011-03-18 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8020 Kevin Korb changed: What|Removed |Added Version|3.0.8 |3.0.7 --- Comment #7 from Kevin Korb 2011-03-

[Bug 8020] --acls does not honor --numeric-ids if UIDs do not match

2011-03-18 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8020 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Version|3.0.7

[Bug 8020] --acls does not honor --numeric-ids if UIDs do not match

2011-03-18 Thread samba-bugs
|| --- Comment #5 from Wayne Davison 2011-03-18 21:57:13 UTC --- Created attachment 6334 --> https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=6334 Don't send names for ACL IDs w/--numeric-ids option Instead of ignoring the names, the sender should not be sending names. This mat

[Bug 8020] --acls does not honor --numeric-ids if UIDs do not match

2011-03-18 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8020 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Korb 2011-03-18 12:49:22 UTC --- The patch does solve my problem. Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA c

[Bug 8020] --acls does not honor --numeric-ids if UIDs do not match

2011-03-18 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8020 Curu Wong changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #6303|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug 8020] --acls does not honor --numeric-ids if UIDs do not match

2011-03-18 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8020 --- Comment #2 from Curu Wong 2011-03-18 09:22:58 UTC --- Comment on attachment 6303 --> https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=6303 rsync ACL numeric-ids option patch diff -ru rsync-3.0.7.orig/acls.c rsync-3.0.7/acls.c --- rsync-3.

[Bug 8020] --acls does not honor --numeric-ids if UIDs do not match

2011-03-18 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8020 --- Comment #1 from Curu Wong 2011-03-18 09:14:54 UTC --- Created attachment 6303 --> https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=6303 rsync ACL numeric-ids option patch It seems that rsync always maps user/group name to ids. we can see that

[Bug 8020] New: --acls does not honor --numeric-ids if UIDs do not match

2011-03-16 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8020 Summary: --acls does not honor --numeric-ids if UIDs do not match Product: rsync Version: 3.0.7 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal

"numeric-ids" parameter in the rsyncd.conf doesn't not wok

2010-12-24 Thread Qian Hao
numeric ids=no Since the parameter "numeric ids" is enabled for the chroot modules by default, I set it to "no" explicitly in the config file.I tried with the command: rsync -go --password-file=/home/yorua007/secrets ./test.txt t...@remote server's ip::enso-home/ But the

RE: Option --numeric-ids not the default?

2007-08-13 Thread Werner Maier
Hi, > I've browsed the history of the list, but can't seem to find > an answer to something that I find quite surprising - why > isn't --numeric-ids the default when rsync is told to > preserve permissions? because all archive-tools do preserve the rights lin

RE: Option --numeric-ids not the default?

2007-08-13 Thread Darryl Dixon
On Sun, 2007-08-12 at 23:48 -0500, Tony Abernethy wrote: > Darryl Dixon wrote: > > > > Hi All, > > > > I've browsed the history of the list, but can't seem to find > > an answer to something that I find quite surprising - why > > isn&

RE: Option --numeric-ids not the default?

2007-08-12 Thread Tony Abernethy
Darryl Dixon wrote: > > Hi All, > > I've browsed the history of the list, but can't seem to find > an answer to something that I find quite surprising - why > isn't --numeric-ids the default when rsync is told to > preserve permissions? It seems to m

Option --numeric-ids not the default?

2007-08-12 Thread Darryl Dixon - Winterhouse Consulting
Hi All, I've browsed the history of the list, but can't seem to find an answer to something that I find quite surprising - why isn't --numeric-ids the default when rsync is told to preserve permissions? It seems to me that the current behaviour runs against the grain of more

[Bug 1900] rsync --daemon hangs with --numeric-ids

2004-10-14 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1900 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 1900] rsync --daemon hangs with --numeric-ids

2004-10-11 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1900 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-11 04:01 --- Created an attachment (id=717) --> (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=717&action=view) Change option parsing This patch separates the daemon-mode's option p

[Bug 1900] rsync --daemon hangs with --numeric-ids

2004-10-11 Thread samba-bugs
Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-11 03:56 --- The problem is that the --numeric-ids option is a client option, not a server option, so setting it on the server side creates confusion in what the client is going to send over the wire. The proper solution is to separate the parsing of daemon

[Bug 1900] New: rsync --daemon hangs with --numeric-ids

2004-10-09 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1900 Summary: rsync --daemon hangs with --numeric-ids Product: rsync Version: 2.6.2 Platform: All OS/Version: FreeBSD Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3

Re: Numeric ids

2002-05-27 Thread Dave Dykstra
file1 from A to B, I would like to have usr_A's numeric id in > site A to be copied to usr_A's numeric id in site B. I've tried using the > following options, but it did preserve usr_A's uid when file1 reaches site > B: > > rsync -avzo --nume

Numeric ids

2002-05-20 Thread Leaw, Chern Jian
preserve usr_A's uid when file1 reaches site B: rsync -avzo --numeric-ids siteA:/tmp/file1 siteB:/tmp Is there a way which I can preserve the uid of file1 when it's been transferred to site B, hence automatically updating usr_A's uid in site B to 100? Thanks.