Re: rsync splits filenames, creates special characters where none are, weird permissions

2015-01-08 Thread Lenz Weber
The backup has run twice without problems since - it seems like rssh as shell on the host was the culprit. Thank you again, you have really helped me with this! Lenz On 07.01.2015 23:26, Lenz Weber wrote: > Hi, > > Am 07.01.2015 um 18:25 schrieb Paul Slootman: >> On Wed 07 Jan 2015, Lenz Weber

Re: rsync splits filenames, creates special characters where none are, weird permissions

2015-01-07 Thread Lenz Weber
Hi, Am 07.01.2015 um 18:25 schrieb Paul Slootman: > On Wed 07 Jan 2015, Lenz Weber wrote: > >> Where the local destination /data/snapshots is an NFS volume mounted with >> the flags >> (rw,noatime,addr=192.168.1.XX) >> and the source is a symlink to a zfs snapshot - that looks like this: >>

Re: rsync splits filenames, creates special characters where none are, weird permissions

2015-01-07 Thread Wayne Davison
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 7:16 AM, Lenz Weber wrote: > [...] rsyncbackup@server:/var/backups/mail/. [...] > Does that login force a particular rsync command via ssh's authorized_keys file? It looks like the data stream is being garbled, and one way that could happen is if the remote rsync and

Re: rsync splits filenames, creates special characters where none are, weird permissions

2015-01-07 Thread Paul Slootman
On Wed 07 Jan 2015, Lenz Weber wrote: > Where the local destination /data/snapshots is an NFS volume mounted with the > flags > (rw,noatime,addr=192.168.1.XX) > and the source is a symlink to a zfs snapshot - that looks like this: > /var/backups/mail -> > /tank/mail/.zfs/snapshot/zfs-aut

rsync splits filenames, creates special characters where none are, weird permissions

2015-01-07 Thread Lenz Weber
Hello, I have a quite unusual encoding problem (?). I call rsync with the following parameters: /usr/bin/rsync -a --delete --numeric-ids --delete-excluded \ --rsh="/usr/bin/ssh -o StrictHostKeyChecking=no -i \ /etc/rsnapshot_ssh_certs/mykey" \ --link-dest=/data/snapshots/hourly.1/f

[Bug 10522] --detect-renamed patch is causing deletions as if a 'delete flag' was supplied, when none have been

2014-04-13 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10522 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

Re: [Bug 10522] --detect-renamed patch is causing deletions as if a 'delete flag' was supplied, when none have been

2014-04-11 Thread John Pierman
I assume not. This bug appears only if you have applied the "detect-renamed" patch, and are calling "detect-renamed" as a flag. On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Saku Vainikainen < saku.vainikai...@welho.com> wrote: > > I was wondering why my primary NAS was empty the other day.. > > It seems tha

Re: [Bug 10522] --detect-renamed patch is causing deletions as if a 'delete flag' was supplied, when none have been

2014-04-11 Thread Saku Vainikainen
I was wondering why my primary NAS was empty the other day.. It seems that my data was saved by -b option and related parameters, because all my data was hidden in the “Trashcan” -folder on the archive NAS. I’m using rsync to make a safety copy of all files on my primary NAS: rsync -vrtb --bac

[Bug 10522] --detect-renamed patch is causing deletions as if a 'delete flag' was supplied, when none have been

2014-04-09 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10522 --- Comment #3 from J.R. 2014-04-10 02:50:13 UTC --- Created attachment 9840 --> https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=9840 revised patch detect-renamed.diff -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email -

[Bug 10522] --detect-renamed patch is causing deletions as if a 'delete flag' was supplied, when none have been

2014-04-09 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10522 --- Comment #2 from J.R. 2014-04-10 02:49:02 UTC --- I can confirm this problem. I suggest increasing the Severity of this bug to "Critical" because it causes data to be lost without the user requesting this. The problem is that a small section o

[Bug 10522] --detect-renamed patch is causing deletions as if a 'delete flag' was supplied, when none have been

2014-03-28 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10522 --- Comment #1 from John Pierman 2014-03-28 19:10:39 UTC --- I'm sorry typo'd the rsync command, left out the --detect-renamed flag. Should be rsync -rvzhtSin --detect-renamed /tmp/test1/ /tmp/test2/ (In reply to comment #0) > Scenario: > > File

[Bug 10522] New: --detect-renamed patch is causing deletions as if a 'delete flag' was supplied, when none have been

2014-03-28 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10522 Summary: --detect-renamed patch is causing deletions as if a 'delete flag' was supplied, when none have been Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Platform: x86 OS/Ve

Re: Group "None" after synching to a windows machine?

2011-10-20 Thread Linda Walsh
Jack Walter wrote: Hi, I'm using cwrsync with rsync 3.0.8 atm and after syncing a file to Strato HiDrive and back to the local machine the new permissions contain this entry: None (UK-DT-01\None) with Read, Execute; Read and Write (allowed) permissions. It takes a few seconds before

Group "None" after synching to a windows machine?

2011-09-15 Thread Jack Walter
Hi, I'm using cwrsync with rsync 3.0.8 atm and after syncing a file to Strato HiDrive and back to the local machine the new permissions contain this entry: None (UK-DT-01\None) with Read, Execute; Read and Write (allowed) permissions. It takes a few seconds before this entry is displayed

Re: User NONE using rsync in Windows server

2004-11-23 Thread tevfik
> Hi, > I'm using rsync with cygwin to synchronize two windows servers. I've got > files in server side with full permisions to Administrator user, but when > i synchronize it with another windows server, the file placed in client > side has a new group called NONE with read

User NONE using rsync in Windows server

2004-11-23 Thread enric_navarro
Hi, I'm using rsync with cygwin to synchronize two windows servers. I've got files in server side with full permisions to Administrator user, but when i synchronize it with another windows server, the file placed in client side has a new group called NONE with read , write and execute

None

2003-02-26 Thread jarausch
>> On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 10:04:33AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Hi, >> >> on my linux box (2.4.21-pre4-ac4) >> I've used rsync to mirror a rather large /usr/local tree (4 Gb) >> After transmission of many files I get the error message >> rsync error: some files could not be transferred (c