https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12569
--- Comment #23 from Marc Krämer ---
@Wayne: thanks, you're right. I've overlooked this option and didn't expect it
to be harmful. Removing it really solves the issue.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
--
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12569
--- Comment #22 from Wayne Davison ---
The --no-implied-dirs code was recreating the directories after they had been
deleted. I changed it to avoid that if the entry it is processing is marked as
missing. I also silenced the parent-dir warning fo
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12569
--- Comment #21 from Wayne Davison ---
Get rid of --no-implied-dirs and --ignore-errors is also unneeded.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12569
--- Comment #20 from Wayne Davison ---
Oops, I missed the "ls" at the end. I'll give it a look.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing l
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12569
--- Comment #19 from Wayne Davison ---
What in that sequence of events are you claiming is a bug?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12569
--- Comment #17 from Marc Krämer ---
tested release 3.2.2 bug is still present:
$ cd /tmp
$ mkdir x y
$ mkdir -p x/test17/21/ff/zz
$ echo "/test17/21/ff/zz
/test17/21/ff
/test17/21
/test17
" > input.txt
$ cd y
$ rsync --no-r -ltpDcuhROHigoz --no-im
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12569
--- Comment #18 from Marc Krämer ---
tested release 3.2.2 bug is still present:
$ cd /tmp
$ mkdir x y
$ mkdir -p x/test17/21/ff/zz
$ echo "/test17/21/ff/zz
/test17/21/ff
/test17/21
/test17
" > input.txt
$ cd y
$ rsync --no-r -ltpDcuhROHigoz --no-im
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12569
--- Comment #16 from Marc Krämer ---
I'm not sure if this is still the same issue. If the directory vanishes before
transfer, e.g. issuing the command:
rsync -e ssh -d --no-r -ltpDcuhROHigoz --exclude /.sfs.conf --exclude
/.sfs.mounted --no-implie
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12569
--- Comment #15 from Tomas Korbar ---
Ah. Sorry about that. I misunderstood your previous comment.
Thanks for clarification.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12569
--- Comment #14 from Wayne Davison ---
As I mentioned above, I've already fixed the issue and left this open as a
reminder to look into an even better solution in the future.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12569
--- Comment #13 from Tomas Korbar ---
Hi Wayne,
There is a report on this in RHEL too [0], and i reproduced it also in Fedora.
Did you make any progress?
I can help with implementation of fix if you want.
Thanks for any information you can provide.
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12569
Wayne Davison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #12 from Wayne Daviso
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12569
--- Comment #11 from Paul Slootman ---
Created attachment 14775
--> https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=14775&action=edit
proposed patch
This patch is based on the patch posted earlier, but checks the options
--delete-missing-args and -
?
(https://mail.edison.tech/chat-invite.html?invitorName=Chris%20Goodman&invitorEmail=cgoody2...@gmail.com&message=?&mid=572b82e3c44e452eab297ad5de8726d6&inviteeName=Rsync-Qa&inviteeEmail=rsync...@samba.org)
Sent With Edison Mail
>
>
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12569
--- Comment #10 from Marc Krämer ---
@Axel: cool, I've played a bit with your tool, but for my needs with many
directories inotify was the pitfall.
I'm coauthor on sfs (https://github.com/mokraemer/sfs) which uses fuse for
signaling. And then, as
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12569
--- Comment #9 from Axel Kittenberger ---
@Marc, indeed. I'm the author of Lsyncd.
https://github.com/axkibe/lsyncd
If this could work properly, it would simplify things a lot, also improve
perfomance a good deal. Due to this bug I had to drop th
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12569
--- Comment #8 from Marc Krämer ---
@Axel: you're right. This is not what we want. Even the output
sync warning: some files vanished before they could be transferred
is not desireable if the parameter is called "ignore" there should not be any
out
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12569
--- Comment #7 from Axel Kittenberger ---
No please don't close. Still not the behavior I'd expect:
"""
~$ mkdir test
~$ cd test
test$ mkdir -p src/a trg/a
test$ echo "/a/b/c" > list
test$ /usr/bin/rsync -slt --ignore-errors --force --ignore-missi
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12569
--- Comment #6 from Marc Krämer ---
ups, didn't get a notice from your reply.
Thanks for your explanation. This was not obvious to me. It should be
documented, the behaviour has changed.
You can close this one, thanks.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12569
--- Comment #5 from Dave Gordon ---
I think you need to add "--no-implied-dirs" to get the behaviour you want.
The issue is that the contents list contains /a/b/c, so problems with that
specific file are suppressed by "--ignore-missing-args", but
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12569
--- Comment #4 from Marc Krämer ---
My bugreport at mageia: https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21395
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12569
--- Comment #3 from Marc Krämer ---
that is my understanding too! And this was true before the last release.
Basic tools like rsync should not break their behaviour!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
--
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12569
--- Comment #2 from Axel Kittenberger ---
shouldn't "--ignore-errors" already be that parameter?
It uses --force also.
--ignore-errors --force --i-really-mean-it? :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
--
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12569
--- Comment #1 from Marc Krämer ---
I'd like to point out that this change is a changed behavior that breaks some
scripts depending on this behavior.
Can you consider to change it to the original behavior, or add a new parameter,
that causes missin
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12569
Bug ID: 12569
Summary: Missing directory errors not ignored
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.2
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Dear rsync-list,
I got following issue demonstrated by this script:
-
$ mkdir -p src/a trg/a
$ echo "/a/b/c" > list
$ /usr/bin/rsync -slt --ignore-errors --force --ignore-missing-args
--delete-missing-args --files-from=list src localhost:`pwd`/trg
file has vanished: "/home/axel/src/a/b"
ABORTI
26 matches
Mail list logo
