-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
So I reported a bug to the bugzilla,
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10527. No one seems to have
commented on it or categorized it, so I'm wondering if there is
something else I should do to report the bug? Or are people just busy?
Che
Not being on the list, I didn't see this earlier.
Terry said
> John wrote:
>
> > Possibly rsync can use ssh to forward a local port chosen the same way ftp
> > chooses a port fo active ftp. Then local rsync opens a connexion to
> > 127.0.0.1:port at the local end, and ssh forwards the stream to
John wrote:
Possibly rsync can use ssh to forward a local port chosen the same way ftp
chooses a port fo active ftp. Then local rsync opens a connexion to
127.0.0.1:port at the local end, and ssh forwards the stream to rsync running
as a daemon (on another randomly-chosen port? a user-specified por
On Tue, 1 Jun 2004, Paul Haas wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Jun 2004, John wrote:
>
> > That may be so, but I don't think this is one of them. rsyncx is bound to have
> > all rsync's bugs. Qute possibly some will be fixed first there, and it may be
> > they will add valuable new features. One that I think w
On Tue, 1 Jun 2004, John wrote:
> That may be so, but I don't think this is one of them. rsyncx is bound to have
> all rsync's bugs. Qute possibly some will be fixed first there, and it may be
> they will add valuable new features. One that I think would be nice is an
> automatic retry: I keep get
On Tue, 1 Jun 2004, Martin Pool wrote:
> On 1 Jun 2004, John Summerfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The jitterbug link on http://rsync.samba.org/nobugs.html no longer works. I
> > suggest it either be fixed or removed.
>
> Thanks, fixed.
>
> > You mak
On 1 Jun 2004, John Summerfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The jitterbug link on http://rsync.samba.org/nobugs.html no longer works. I
> suggest it either be fixed or removed.
Thanks, fixed.
> You make bug-reporting needlessly difficult, I think. I dislike the need to
&
Quoting Dave Dykstra ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Having a well-maintained FAQ would also be valuable, to keep the noise
> put into the bug tracking system down.
Out of curiosity, and at the risk of going off-topic, are there
particular Web content-management frameworks for FAQs / knowledgebases
people
a "bugmaster" position who could
> > > coordinate something like this.
> >
> > The situation is rather different to GNOME, as jw notes: the code is
> > not growing very quickly, and there are far fewer developers available
> > to work on it.
> >
e situation is rather different to GNOME, as jw notes: the code is
> not growing very quickly, and there are far fewer developers available
> to work on it.
>
> > > There used to be another bug reporting system but it was being ignored
> > > so Martin turned it off.
>
On 9 Dec 2002, R P Herrold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Really a better FAQ editor process seems more useful. Isn't
> this the purpose of a CVS and commit privileges -- set up one
> or more trusted editors with rights, and delegate that aspect.
Anybody who wants to maintain the FAQ-O-Matic al
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Martin Pool wrote:
> - misunderstandings of how to use rsync (operator error)
> - massively incomplete reports (e.g. just "it fails", without any
>error message.)
> - architectural limitations (e.g. upfront scan)
> - other junk entries
> Too many people fail to realize
o GNOME, as jw notes: the code is
not growing very quickly, and there are far fewer developers available
to work on it.
> > There used to be another bug reporting system but it was being ignored
> > so Martin turned it off.
Yes, I did. I think the system was broken by some kind o
If the model works thats fine but people who don't want to be on the
mailing list it's a nice way to look things up. I don't want to add
more complexity by adding bug tracking if what people are using today
is fine with them.
I think where we are at; is that we are just waiting for a volunteer
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 03:39:18PM -0800, jw schultz wrote:
> Just to look at what it might look like i extracted the BUGS
> from NEWS and OLDNEWS to try formulating a list. The
> biggest problem with it is that the bugs are described
> according to the fix instead of the symptoms. I've attached
ng bugs? Just curious.
> > > I was looking on the rsync website and didn't see much in bug
> > > reporting.
> >
> > There used to be another bug reporting system but it was being ignored
> > so Martin turned it off. I think it would be a good idea to have
0, Dave Dykstra wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 04:42:35PM -0800, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
> > Have you considered using bugzilla for reporting bugs? Just curious.
> > I was looking on the rsync website and didn't see much in bug
> > reporting.
>
> There used to b
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 04:42:35PM -0800, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
> Have you considered using bugzilla for reporting bugs? Just curious.
> I was looking on the rsync website and didn't see much in bug
> reporting.
There used to be another bug reporting system but it was being ign
Have you considered using bugzilla for reporting bugs? Just curious.
I was looking on the rsync website and didn't see much in bug
reporting.
sri
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/
19 matches
Mail list logo
