On Tue, 1 Jun 2004, John wrote: > That may be so, but I don't think this is one of them. rsyncx is bound to have > all rsync's bugs. Qute possibly some will be fixed first there, and it may be > they will add valuable new features. One that I think would be nice is an > automatic retry: I keep getting timeouts transferring between two ADSL accounts > and I've not decide whether to blame Arachnet (the ISP at both ends) or rsync > or even to suppose I'm expecting too much.
That used to happen to me. Upgrading the firmware in my network hardware fixed the problem. > wget has an option to automatically retry after timeouts, and it would > certainly be useful to me if rsync did too. > I may well decide to implement that myself: if I do, it would probably be in > rsyncx if I decide that is where it would best suit me. The ideal place would be in ssh. > Enough. I'm typing on a remote machine over an overtaxed dialup line:-( > > heers > John > > > -- > To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync > Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html > -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
