Re: Bug: in 2.6.1

2004-09-17 Thread Wayne Davison
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 02:24:26PM +0100, Gordon Lack wrote: >Is there some way to get symlinks to replace non-empty directories > without using --delete? The --force option does this. ..wayne.. -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting

Bug: in 2.6.1

2004-09-17 Thread Gordon Lack
If, in a hierarchy which has been previously rsync()ed, I replace a non-empty directory with a symbolic link the rsync will fail. It does work if the original directory was empty. It also works if I specify --delete (presumably since that deletes first, so we end up with an empty directo

BUG in 2.6.1: avoid --relative !

2004-04-29 Thread Wayne Davison
There's a sorting bug in 2.6.1 that can occur when --relative is used that can make it update files incorrectly (since the file list is out of order, rsync asks for the wrong file's data). ** Do not use --relative (-R) in 2.6.1. ** ** Don't forget that --files-from sets --rela

Bug in 2.6.1

2004-04-28 Thread Gordon Lack
I'm not sure what the code is trying to do, but the SGI Irix compiler spotted this usage of an undefined variable. In uidlist.c: === static int map_uid(int id, char *name) { uid_t uid; if (uid != 0 && name_to_uid(name, &uid)) return uid; return