On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 06:45:48PM -0500, Paul Faure wrote:
> Any chance of getting the regexp include/exclude code in the next
> version?
I consider a modified regex (discussion belonging in another
thread), ACLs, EAs and several other things to be good
candidates for 2.5.7cvs.
I am not one of
Any chance of getting the regexp include/exclude code in the next
version?
jw schultz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 09:53:31AM -0800, Martin Pool wrote:
> > On 5 Nov 2002, jw schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > This might be a good time for tagging 2.5.6 perhaps. A fa
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 09:53:31AM -0800, Martin Pool wrote:
> On 5 Nov 2002, jw schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This might be a good time for tagging 2.5.6 perhaps. A fair
> > number of bugfixes have gone in, popt updates, and a few new
> > features. It has been stable for about 2 months
On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 01:46:12PM +0900, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ?$B5HF#1QL@ wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Wed, 6 Nov 2002 09:47:28 -0800),
>jw schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
>
> > > Please apply my IPv6 ACL patch.
> > > This is very important for ipv6-enabled environment.
> > >
>
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Wed, 6 Nov 2002 09:47:28 -0800), jw
schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> > Please apply my IPv6 ACL patch.
> > This is very important for ipv6-enabled environment.
> >
>
> Rsync CVS has been stable for about 2 months. This appears
> to be new functionality. W
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 11:26:57PM +0900, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ?$B5HF#1QL@ wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Tue, 5 Nov 2002 09:45:02 -0800),
>jw schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
>
> > > I think there really have been no commits since then:
> > >
> > > http://cvs.samba.org/cgi-bin/cv
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Tue, 5 Nov 2002 09:45:02 -0800), jw
schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> > I think there really have been no commits since then:
> >
> > http://cvs.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/rsync/?sortby=date#dirlist
> >
> > We are all slackers and/or overworked. :-(
> >
> >
On 5 Nov 2002, jw schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This might be a good time for tagging 2.5.6 perhaps. A fair
> number of bugfixes have gone in, popt updates, and a few new
> features. It has been stable for about 2 months. Unless
> there is something in the pipeline it sounds like time to
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 08:37:00AM -0800, Martin Pool wrote:
> On 10 Oct 2002, "Green, Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > No new CVS messages have appeared on the rsync-cvs archives since August
> > 30th. This seems rather odd-- perhaps a daemon stopped working? If there
> > has truly been no
